1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
insens350 [35]
4 years ago
13

A memoir is based on a real life event

English
1 answer:
dybincka [34]4 years ago
3 0
Yes it is based on a true event in chronological order
You might be interested in
What are the players planning next?
crimeas [40]

Answer: Well not sure because there is no image for the question!

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Man Who Would Be King:
ale4655 [162]

The Man Who Would Be King:

1. How do Carnehan and Dravot’s first encounters with Kipling (the character) compare to their visit to Kipling’s newspaper office together? What do you learn about Carnehan and Dravot through their actions?

The narrator of the story is an Indian journalist in 19th century India—Kipling himself, in all but name. Whilst on a tour of some Indian native states he meets two scruffy adventurers, Daniel Dravot and Peachey Carnehan.  

2. What is revealed about the character of the narrator through his detailed description of his job as a journalist? What type of man does he seem to be?

The narrator seems to be a good journalist and and also a good person that softened by their stories,  agrees to help Dravot and Carnehan in a minor errand, but later he regrets this and informs the authorities about them—preventing them from blackmailing a minor rajah.

3. What details from your reading help explain why Carnehan and Dravot would want to travel to the wilderness of Kafiristan? Do you think their reasons are valid?

A few months later the pair (Dravot and Carnehan) appear at his newspaper office in Lahore. They tell him of a plan they have hatched. They declare that after years of trying their hands at all manner of things, they have decided that "India is not big enough for them". They plan to go to Kafiristan and set themselves up as kings. Dravot will pass as a native and, armed with twenty Martini-Henry rifles, they plan to find a king or chief to help him defeat enemies. Once that is done, they will take over for themselves. I think their reasons are not so valid because if you are too much ambitious you can even lose everythin in the game and at the end they suffered the consequences.

4. How do the physical descriptions of Carnehan and Dravot compare to their personalities? What significance do you think their physical appearance has in comparison to their plan?

They look scruffy but the fact of being white, hairy and blond took an important part in achieving their targets. The fact of not showing any respect to the Kafir's idols made them be successful in pretending to be descendants of Alexander the great. Their appearance was ideal for their plan. The big mistake is when  Dravot decided to marry a Kafir girl and she bit him when he wanted to kiss her. When the priest noticed that he was bleeding, Kafir people realised that they were simple human beings.

5. What level of importance do Carnehan and Dravot place on their “contrack” with one another? How does this compare with the impression Kipling (the character) has of them?

They were very comitted and the even had a contract not to marry to do what they wanted. Kipling was impressed of their comittment.


5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which excerpt from "When Believing Isn't Seeing" is the best example of logos?
valina [46]
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "D. "One is that most neighboring jurisdictions are no more than 20 minutes away; it wouldn't be that hard to find someone who didn't know about suspects in a case."
4 0
3 years ago
Read the paragraph. Then answer the question that follows. Perhaps you wanted pizza for dinner, but was out voted by the rest of
max2010maxim [7]
The correct answer is B. Both show conflict between the rights of individuals and groups.

Both show how the common good is always above an individual good. The common good is "common" because it protects the interests of the majority of people, while not jeopardizing any individuals. That's why there are democratic elections, where everybody has the right to vote, but the majority decides who is going to represent them. It's not that the individual's opinion doesn't count or doesn't matter; on the contrary, it always counts. But at the end, it's about the assessment of all members of a group.
5 0
3 years ago
Read "The Coyote and the Bear"
artcher [175]
Don’t forget to appreciate life
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Describe any incident of gulliver travels in detail
    7·1 answer
  • How does Benvolio, personify Romeo's love and where it belongs?
    10·2 answers
  • In no less than seventy-five words, explain who the characters are, here; how they are involved with Minerva; and what theme Min
    6·2 answers
  • Decide whether the following is a simile, metaphor, or neither. We shall walk in velvet shoes. simile metaphor neither
    8·2 answers
  • Which words make up the adjective phrase in this sentence?
    11·2 answers
  • The main reason an author include evidence in a case study is to help the reader creek case study. Add a case study. Draw a conc
    11·1 answer
  • 2. Believe me based on my honor, and have respect for my honor, so you can believe. Judge me in your wisdom, and wake up your se
    13·1 answer
  • Has anyone heard nf new song clouds<br><br> if so what do you think about it
    8·1 answer
  • Jamie had been at her new school for only three weeks. She liked the classroom and the
    15·1 answer
  • Present Perfect exercise (Due Today)
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!