1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
AURORKA [14]
3 years ago
13

Which of the following describes the rights and legal standing of a European villein?

History
2 answers:
Inessa [10]3 years ago
4 0
I think its the first one 
lubasha [3.4K]3 years ago
3 0

Correct answer choice is :


<h2>A) They worked the land on behalf of their lord but did not receive wages. </h2><h2 /><h2>Explanation:</h2><h2 />

Villein, or villain, was a name used in the feudal era to indicate a farmer who was legitimately united to a lord of the estate a villain in gross or in the event of a villein regardant to a manor. The preponderance of medieval European peasants were villains. Villains usually rented small homes, with or without land. As part of the agreement with their landlord, they were required to use some of their time to farm the lord's demesne or give other services, perhaps in addition to a rent of money or goods.

You might be interested in
How did laws passed by the British parliament after 1763 affect American trade and industry
abruzzese [7]
There was a rule saying that two groups couldn't trade. and so food and macines stopped coming in to be used 
6 0
3 years ago
What is the name of person who travel to anther country to do religion work
maks197457 [2]

Answer:

proselytizer

Explanation:

1: to induce someone to convert to one's faith. 2 : to recruit someone to join one's party, institution, or cause. transitive verb. : to recruit or convert especially to a new faith, institution, or cause.

Hope that helps!❤️

4 0
3 years ago
The United States placed a wheat embargo on which country in the late 1970s and early 1980s?
kykrilka [37]

Afghanistan.........

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In 1878, the Supreme Court denied George Reynolds right to practice bigamy which is a part of his Mormon religion. Why was Mr. R
enyata [817]

The Supreme Court said Mr. Reynolds could not break the law while practicing his religion.

Reynolds v. the United States was heard by the Supreme Court in 1878 in regard the Morrill Anti-Bigamy Act placed on the Utah Territory.

Reynolds argued that preventing him to marry more than one woman was a violation of his First Amendment rights to protection of religion. The Supreme Court concluded that he had the right to his belief but he could not go around the law to practice his faith. The law stated marriage was to be between two people only and therefore he could not be married to more than one woman.

8 0
3 years ago
Question 2 (3 points)
garri49 [273]

Answer:

The answer is C) Customs and traditions.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did the Spanish intervene in Hati?
    9·2 answers
  • The distance you travel from seeing the danger to putting your foot one the brake pedal is known as
    5·1 answer
  • in 1920 theodore Roosevelt was supported by the republican, conservatives or old guard true false pls need help
    9·2 answers
  • Hurry please Which preposition best fits the sentence? Do you think Bobby will ______ meeting us at the hardware store instead o
    11·2 answers
  • HISTORY HELP!!!!
    6·1 answer
  • Most of the protestors in Tiananmen Square were elderly people who were tired of living under the communist regime. True False
    5·2 answers
  • To increase the supply of food, some neolithic communities living in arid regions of the world devloped
    13·1 answer
  • Unalienable rights are best described as rights that -
    7·2 answers
  • I need help I can't see unswers what should I do....
    5·1 answer
  • How did the wave of Immigration to the United States in the late 1800s and early 1900s affect the country's population distribut
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!