Answer: It tells us what will happen again if we do not learn from the past.
We all need to be informed of slavery, the holocaust, evil leaders and regimes, and man-made environmental disasters so we can avoid having them happen again.
Ignorance of the past is very dangerous.
Intentionally revising history to say there was no holocaust (or to revise other shameful periods in history) is even worse because people won't learn from what they do not believe in.
If we look at how technology builds on itself we can postulate to some extent from the progression where we will be in X number of years. Looking at the history of the automobile, medicine, or any other field, we can make reasonable, educated assumptions.
Some assumptions in medicine, for example, are that we will have unrejected organ replacement therapy, a greatly extended life span and nanotechnology.
Explanation:
British raj, period of direct British rule over the Indian subcontinent from 1858 until the independence of India and Pakistan in 1947. The raj succeeded management of the subcontinent by the British East India Company, after general distrust and dissatisfaction with company leadership resulted in a widespread mutiny of sepoy troops in 1857, causing the British to reconsider the structure of governance in India. The British government took possession of the company’s assets and imposed direct rule. The raj was intended to increase Indian participation in governance, but the powerlessness of Indians to determine their own future without the consent of the British led to an increasingly adamant national independence movement.
Answer:
The Treaty of Versailles is one of the most controversial armistice treaties in history. The treaty's so-called “war guilt” clause forced Germany and other Central Powers to take all the blame for World War I. This meant a loss of territories, reduction in military forces, and reparation payments to Allied powers.
I think its d
hope thats helps you have a good day
