Does the rules committee influence the outcome of a bill more than its sponsor

2 answers:

7 0

<span>The rules committee ultimately wields greater influence over the outcome of a bill than the bills sponsor. This is due to the fact that the rules committee has the final approval over proposed bills, making the sponsor subject to the ruling of the committee.</span>

strojnjashka [21]3 years ago

3 0

The Rules Committee influences the outcome of the law more than its sponsors, because the committee has the power of final approval for proposed laws, and thus makes the sponsors to be subject to the committee's decision. This committee is one of the most important in the House of Representatives, determines that part of the law comes to the floor, how much the amendment can be considered, and how much time is scheduled for discussion.

You might be interested in

Which city in this table is NOT a part of any

Volgvan

Answer:

I think D

Explanation:

Sana makatulong

8 0

3 years ago

What was the Japanese mission at Pearl Harbor?

dmitriy555 [2]

Answer:

To "Climb Mount Niitaka"

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How could having no national court system affect a family that moved from one state to another?

irina1246 [14]

Answer: The family would have to relearn the court system.

Explanation: The moving family would have to relearn the court system in the new state because they are guided by different constitution. An absence of national court in a country indicates that, family moving from one state to another would have to relearn how the court system in their new host state works, however, this is because the law that is used by a particular state might be different from another, and only a national court law can affect all states.

6 0

3 years ago

Considering the Bretton Woods System, identify at least 2 conditions and the categories they fit

vichka [17]

The chief features of the Bretton Woods system were an obligation for each country to adopt a monetary policy that maintained its external exchange rates within 1 percent by tying its currency to gold and the ability of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to bridge temporary imbalances of payments.

Hope it helps yu....

8 0

3 years ago

Why do you think the 1947 UN Partition Plan was accepted by the Jews, but rejected by the

gayaneshka [121]

Answer:

The Palestinian Arab leadership rejected partition as unacceptable, given the inequality in the proposed population exchange and the transfer of one-third of Palestine, including most of its best agricultural land, to recent immigrants.

Explanation:

4 0

3 years ago