Answer: $116.026
Explanation:
Given the following ;
Yearly hazard insurance = $350
Keisha is the buyer and the closing date of transaction is September 1 of the year.
January 1 till September 1 = 244days
Now Keisha will have to credit John from September 2 till December 31st of that year
Therefore,
September 2 till December 31 = 365 - 244 = 121 days
Daily hazard insurance = $350 ÷ 365 = $0.9589
Keisha's share = $0.9589 × 121 = $116.026
1. The arguments that these people put forward was to exonerate the president by saying the situation was beyond his control.
<h3>The argument that Feingold put forward</h3>
He argued that there were many situations that occurred that were beyond the capacity of Roosevelt's administration. These were
- The determination to liquidate Jews by Berlin.
- The decision to rescue a minority in a foreign land that the US did not owe any responsibility.
<h3>The argument that Heuvel put forward</h3>
Heuvel sternly said that it was ironic to put any blames on Roosevelt because he was not the one that caused the holocaust.
According to him, no one had any backgrounds to fault him for what was being done by Hitler because he was not the cause.
2. What Michael meant was that it was not a common occurrence for the president to be silent on issues that are as pressing as this.
According to him, the president was a person that would speak up fast on serious world issues. He meant it was not in the character of the president to be late in issues of this sort.
3. Wyman called it the worst failure of his presidency because he refused to act for a long time during the extermination.
From what he said, the president only stepped in to save the Jews out of pressure.
Read more on the holocaust here:
brainly.com/question/12962
Answer:
B. both the size of the deadweight loss from a tax and the tax incidence
Explanation:
The price elasticities of demand & supply are : buyers' & sellers' - demand & supply responsiveness to price change.
On levy of indirect tax - whose burden can be shared between buyers & sellers ; it affects tax incidence & deadweight loss both :-
- More tax burden shifts on buyers if demand is more inelastic, more tax burden shifts on sellers if supply is more inelastic.
- Deadweight loss is the effect of tax re allocation, benefitting neither of consumer surplus, producer surplus, government revenue. It is less when demand &, or supply are more inelastic
<span>What kind of change might driving law need to account for over time? Age of allowed drivers, fatalities from driving, and different things drivers do that become "illegal" while behind the wheel. As fatalities increase, driving laws should reevaluate why that could be happening and what type of law they can put in place to reduce the amount of fatalities over time. </span>
Personally I spend about 4 hours on schoolwork (assuming there are no projects).
(4 hours because I'm taking 4 APs)
I spend extra 2-3 hours just reviewing/studying.
The remaining time is used to have fun ;)
