1 is G number 2 is wait if i get it wrong please dont be mad number 2 is b thats all i know ok if i got it wrong sorry
Answer:
The use of Reinforcement and Punishment
Explanation:
Reinforcement and punishment are the concepts which used in educational psychology. Both terms are contradictory to each other. these terms are used in ope-rant conditioning. In ope-rant conditioning, positive and negative doesn't means good or bad. Positive means adding something and negative means take away something. reinforcement means to increase positive behavior. Punishment means you are decreasing negative behavior.
Reinforcement and punishment both are demonstrated with external stimulus but on the other hand dream analysis, slip of tongue, someone mind seemingly innocent these terms are related to our mind, our unconsciousness.
Many people talk about academic excellence — but who or what really defines this elusive quality?
Michèle Lamont, Robert I. Goldman Professor of European Studies and professor of sociology and of African and African American studies, analyzes the system of peer review in her new book “How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment” (Harvard University Press, 2009). By examining the process of scholarly evaluation, she also addresses larger questions about academia.
“In some ways studying peer evaluation and review is a point of entry into a much broader issue, which is the issue of meritocracy in American higher education,” says Lamont.
To research the book, Lamont interviewed panelists from research councils and societies of fellows who were evaluating proposals for research funding in the social sciences and the humanities.
Lamont explains that academics must constantly make evaluations, whether of scientific findings or of graduate students. Expertise, personal taste, and the perspective of the evaluator play into the decision-making process, she writes.
“A lot of what the book does is to look at what criteria people use to judge and what meaning they give to these criteria,” says Lamont. “So for instance, what do they mean by ‘significance’ and what do they mean by ‘originality’? How does the definition of ‘originality’ and ‘significance’ vary between philosophy and economics? How strong is the consensus between fields?