1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
il63 [147K]
4 years ago
13

Which of the following statements is the economic rule that explains why we stop purchasing goods and services after we have con

sumed some?
A. We will consume only while marginal benefit exceeds marginal cost.
B. We will purchase goods only while they are marginal.
C. We marginally consume goods and services when the price exceeds the cost.
D. We will consume goods and services whenever the price is low.
Social Studies
1 answer:
saveliy_v [14]4 years ago
6 0
The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: "C. We marginally consume goods and services when the price exceeds the cost." The statement that is the economic rule that explains why we stop purchasing goods and services after we have consumed some is that <span>We marginally consume goods and services when the price exceeds the cost.</span>
You might be interested in
Where at in the courtroom do the children sit to watch the trial?
Bas_tet [7]
Children arent typically allowed in the courtroom
6 0
4 years ago
PLS HELP ASAP
Ede4ka [16]

Explanation:

well I know the environment was different because the ice Froze all the plants and I know that people Paleolithic people followed their food which was a mammoth over the beringia Bridge and that's really

7 0
3 years ago
Why did n. ireland, egypt, trans-jordan, syria, and palestine fight on the side of the allies?
kompoz [17]
They need food to survive
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
free BRAINLIEST ANSWER if one of you can answer this correctly. You will always find me in the past. I can be created in the pre
svetlana [45]
I wanna say it is Bacteria lol
3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In Leikas,Lönnqvist,and Verkasalo (2012),participants interacted with trained actors.The number of times a participant gazed int
Komok [63]

Answer:

B) The amount of variability explained by the person was large.

Explanation:

Option B is the correct answer. When given the correct interpretation of the result that the number of times a participant gazed into the eyes of his or her partner depended a lot on the behavior of the partner means that the amount of variability explained by the person was large.

The data provided reveals that the number of gazing actually was dependent and a result of the behavior exhibited.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A common micro-level pattern involving social interaction is that ________ social stratification is not usually evident in every
    14·1 answer
  • Is donald trump going to build a wall?
    7·1 answer
  • In the 1950s, Jim Crow laws in many parts of the US created a caste system of legal inequality, in which White Americans and Bla
    15·1 answer
  • Why does the State Department promote fair voting practices in foreign countries? A) to advance democracy
    13·2 answers
  • When Sandra was 18 years old, she was in a serious car accident. Although she made a full recovery from her injuries, she experi
    11·1 answer
  • Pretend you have been conscripted to clean up Chernobyl and write a diary/journal entry about your thoughts about what you are b
    5·1 answer
  • HELP ASAP PLEASE &lt;3
    5·1 answer
  • How does kidney stones affect the excretory system ?
    5·1 answer
  • Please help me and try to answer them all
    12·1 answer
  • Five letter words that start with s and end with r.
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!