They were made to believe or feel like nothing really bad could happen, especially as long as you were in the city. You couldn't fall or hurt yourself.
There are several ways you can think about this split—the wild vs. the domesticated, the free vs. the enslaved, the rugged individual vs. society, the genuine vs. the artificial. I think the message of the poem, however, has to do with freedom of expression and the need to be independent of corrupting social influences
Answer:
B. Expresses interest in contrary views
Explanation:
The correct answer to the question is B. Expresses interest in contrary views
The correct answer is that in the first two sentences the author is expressing interest in the contrary views, the radio broadcast is compared to a passage of a book which is a contrary view.
Of the opening sentences that were presented here that strongly engages the reader and provides context to them would be the second one which is "We could have had a worse weekend, but it's awfully hard to beat Bigfoot and bugs."
The first and third one were just not good enough because it exposes the rest of the context to the reader and lets them have the idea of what you are talking about which usually leads to the readers not choosing to continue to read, thus taking out the reader's engagement but still provides context. The last one is better than the first and third, but it spilled the beans when it mentioned the particulars as to what made the weekend bad to worse. The answer is just right. It has the impact that would hook the reader to know more about your weekend and why is Bigfoot and bugs together in your statement. The rain wasn't mentioned which would be ideal to make the story telling take a turn to much worse which would spike up the interest of the reader.
If the question is multiple choice, please include the options in the questions to make things easier.
