All categories

4 years ago

BRAINLIEST If asked what type of person Frida Kahlo was, how would you describe her?

History

2 answers:

Marizza181 [45]4 years ago

7 0

Answer:

Art historian Nancy Deffebach described Kahlo as someone who “created herself as a subject who was female, Mexican, modern, and powerful” – by using her paintings to question Mexican society and the construction of female identity within it, she ensured her heritage became synonymous with her status as a powerful

Nimfa-mama [501]4 years ago

5 0

Kahlo as someone who was female, Mexican, modern, and powerful she prove that by using her paintings to question Mexican society and the construction of female identity within it. She do things in her own word

god that was my best answer yet!

do I deserve some brainliest??

You might be interested in

4. What year did Samuel Slater build a mill in Rhode Island?

myrzilka [38]

Answer:

1803

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

Which does not describe Christopher Columbus? A. the explorer who made landfall in the Americas and mistakenly called the people

Sonja [21]

D... All the rest are correct I'm pretty sure because what I've read all those happened

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

I have an assignment where I have to write a situation where two people are arguing about something, and two different scenarios

mafiozo [28]

Answer:

OK this is the longest one will ever do

Explanation:

Scenario 1: good scenario, piece of pizza/

" both kids reach for the last piece of pizza"

Kid 1, oops my bad

Kid 2, "takes pizza"

kid 1, im sorry but can i have that i was reaching for it firste

kid 2, i feel like since i touched it it should be mine

KId 1, how about tommorow i get the piece

Kid 2, okay cool see you tommorow

Scenerio 2: bad, piece of pizza

" both reach for last piece of pizza"

Kid 1 "takes it fast"

Kid 2, That is mine

Kid 1, why is it on my tray then

Kid 2 its not

Kid 2 "takes from tray

Kid 1, Yelling/ That is mine

Kid 2 throws pizza

lolllll okay im sorry funnnytho

7 0

3 years ago

why might twentieth century thought reject the importance of history? what might we learn from clio’s example of studying histor

loris [4]

Because the twentieth century's events demonstrated communism to be a catastrophic failure, twentieth century philosophy rejected the value of history.

<h3>Why was the 20th century such an important era in world history?</h3>

The Spanish flu pandemic, World Wars I and II, nuclear weapons, nuclear power, and space exploration, nationalism and decolonization, scientific achievements, and the Cold War and post-Cold War conflicts dominated the 20th century and contributed to the formation of the modern era.

The First World War and the start of the Second World War in 1914 and 1939, respectively, are examples of the twentieth century's severe brutality.

To know more about importance of history visit :

brainly.com/question/12118238

#SPJ4

4 0

1 year ago

On mercantilist system a country tries to increase its _____ and decreases it’s ___.

sergejj [24]

I think its The answer is b

8 0

4 years ago