Laziness, Dishonesty, Unkindness, Grouchiness, Unselfishness.
Answer:
1. A local ecosystem can be upset by the death of certain species of animals.
- Appeals to emotions (Pathos)
2. As a scientist, I can attest that some forms of pollution are not pollution at all.
- Appeals to Ethics (Ethos)
3. As an environmental expert, I can speak with authorities about the dangers of pollution.
- Appeals to Ethics (Ethos)
4. Breathing toxic air can cause human and animal health problems.
5. Garbage dumped in landfills is an eyesore to the general public.
- Appeals to Emotions (Pathos)
6. If we don't stop polluting the earth, all human life will be destroyed.
- Appeals to Ethics (Ethos)
7. Light pollution disrupts a person's view of the night sky.
- Appeals to Ethics (Ethos)
8. Pollution is an immoral act that instills guilt and shame in the person polluting.
9. If you pollute, you should be thrown into prison.
- Appeals to Emotions (Pathos)
10. Noise pollution disrupts the natural sounds of the world.
- Appeals to Ethics (Ethos)
Chug kuhn jabbing at orange juice lol you got it too hot and you didn’t know what it did lol i to do that one too much and then you have a lot
I think to i’m not sure tho sorry
Answer:
To emphasize the very real damage hate speech inflicts.
Explanation:
Prof. Laura Beth Nielsen wrote about the issue of hate speech in an op-ed and details the physical as well as mental 'illness' it can give a person. The issue of hate speech is much more than what meets the eye, and that it is something that is still plaguing the world.
In the given excerpt from the article, Nielsen uses the word <em>"harm"</em> continuously. This repetition is mostly used to lay great emphasis on the very word, and also to 'highlight' the effect on others. She remarks how hate speeches <em>"collectively amount to the harm of subordination. The harm of perpetuating discrimination. The harm of creating inequality."</em> And it is not just physical torment that it causes, but even has <em>"mental health outcomes"</em>. She uses <em>"harm" </em>repetitively to emphasize the real damage that hate speeches inflict on the receivers.
Thus, the correct answer is the first option.
