I assume you are referring to his 1914 Address to Congress. His chief evidence is that America is composed of people of diverse origins and ancestry. So, while some citizens would want one side to win, others would want another. That would create a fatal division and discord among American citizens, whose main interests should be on the side of their present homeland, that is the U.S. Basically, Wilson wants to say that he doesn't profess neutrality on behalf of his own, as a statesman and a decision maker; he professes it on behalf of American citizens and their common interest.
"<span>Such divisions amongst us would be fatal to our peace of mind and might seriously stand in the way of the proper performance of our duty as the one great nation at peace, the one people holding itself ready to play a part of impartial mediation and speak the counsels of peace and accommodation, not as a partisan, but as a friend." - this is the strongest evidence presented in the speech. It refers to possible consequences of America's taking sides in this conflict.</span>
Plantain workers now a days more freedoms but plantain workers served the master or was not fed or housed as long as u did your work the mast would seem somewhat fair.depending on what kind of person that master was.most were unfair and let their workers go unfed dirty and deseased .so yes back then it did now a days not so much depends on which era you are talking about
Wait what is the question
Answer:
12
Explanation:
Q3 is the middle value in the second half of the data set. Again, since the second half of the data set has an even number of observations, the middle value is the average of the two middle values; that is, Q3 = (6 + 7)/2 or Q3 = 6.5. The interquartile range is Q3 minus Q1, so IQR = 6.5 - 3.5 = 3.
Answer:
the answer is Ricardo screamed as he spilled his frozen pineapple slushy.
Explanation:
u wouldnt need any commas in this sentence.