Explanation:
Gender equality is fundamental to the achievement of human rights and is an aspiration that benefits all of society, including girls and women. The universal advantages of gender equality have been well-documented, and several international frameworks have affirmed its centrality to human rights and sustainable development. The Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action, for example, unanimously adopted by 189 countries in 1995 and still the strongest global consensus for advancing and protecting girls’ and women’s equality and justice, recognizes that persistent inequalities pose “serious consequences for the well-being of all people.”
Yet, despite the promise of equality, progress towards it has been slow, fragile, incremental, and reversible – and dramatically undermined by the pandemic. In fact, in every region of the world, girls and women are still more likely to be poor, illiterate, hungry, unhealthy, underrepresented in leadership positions, legally constrained, politically marginalized, and endangered by violence.
Answer:
Both are important of coarse. In different cases different persons are important in different ways. But from my point of view both are important
Hope it helps! :)
A compare and contrast essay should identify complex details. Simple, basic, and unimportant details are all things that the reader can either figure out on their own or won't even need to know. Talking about the complex details really allows you to address all the points on what makes these two topics different from one another and what makes them similar.
Cliches like "in the nick of time", "throughout history", "in this day and age", "little did i know" and "good things come to those who wait" are some of the most overused and annoying cliches. Cliches are usually not acceptable in academic writing because of a few factors:
1. Cliches sometimes make you seem boring. When using a cliche, you are giving the reader the impression that you lack originality, which will make them want to stop reading your paper.
2. Cliches make you seem lazy. The reader will just assume that you do not want to put your mind to something and be creative.
3. Cliches make you lose credibility. The person reading your paper will not trust you as a valid source if you cannot come up with a better description than a cliche.
4. Cliches cannot be used as actual evidence. Because cliches are not specific, they do not offer strong enough commentary to prove your point.
To conclude, cliches are overused and will not help you in any way while writing a paper.
Hope this helps:)
Answer: in your SAR
Explanation:
The Student Aid Report (SAR) is simply referred to as a document that helps one in knowing if he or she is eligible for the federal student aid.
It should be noted that once a student has finished his or her application, the Expected Family Contribution in the students aid report but in a scenario whereby the person has an application that is not complete, the EFC will not be included in the students aid report.
