The answer is: effective secondary source document"
Within 20 years, historians would have enough time to gather all facts and data from all sides that involved in historical event. All of these facts and data is useful for them to decipher how the historical events were unfolded.
This make the chart an effective source to find for information regarding the event. But, since it does not made by people who actually involved in the events, it could only be considered as a secondary source.
The correct answer is C. I asked him if Mitchell could go with us. "He's right good with horses now," I said. "He's gentle with them, and they trust him."
Explanation:
Direct characterization can be identified because characters are described through adjectives or precise details that let you known how a character is. This does not occur in indirect characterization that implies presenting the words and actions of the character to indirectly show the personality of the character.
Direct characterization occurs in the third excerpt because Mitchell is described as "gentle"; also, this occurs in the detail "He's good with horses now" because these show the personality of Mitchell and his abilities with horses. Also, in other options, Mitchell's personality is presented through his actions or words, which is indirect characterization.
It is C because the men were out to fight the war and in that time only men could have jobs, so when the men left the women had to take over and their role was so important because they were making everything all the soldiers needed like food and ammunition.
The native americans thought the french was less a threat and the french also treated the native americans with more respect.
<span>Rich Soil Rivers with plenty of fish The fur trade and lots of wild games.</span>
