The correct answer is: violation of individual liberties, and the violation of the national and international laws.
As much as the government has plausible for doing it so, as we look back at the history of terrorist attacks, the government would argue the indefinite detention without, considering it aa form of prevention. If we know the human rights we will realize the most viable and obvious argument for being against that type of detention is the violation of national and international laws about the individual liberties. That's when there is no evidence of crime and when the individual does not represent national threat. It may be controversial the way government tries to deal with issues like that, but international organizations has made very clear their points about
Answer:
1.
Explanation:to ensure freedom of speech for all citizens.
Laws controlling monopolies,
The Clayton Antitrust Act,
The Federal Trade Commission.
The Significant portal of the photo of the oxygen is H2O also the Cold War update is really knew so the 678 so also I never knew how PCs work on the PC Chromebook world but then I was among us imposter so that was working
Answer:
the best answer would B: it inspired many Europeans to revolt against powerful monarch