Leadership is not needed when:
- It will make processes inefficient due to time wasting
- It is being used to oppress people
- Subordinates don't need leadership
Leadership is usually quite good as it can galvanize subordinates to be better workers due to better organization as well as inspiration.
There are instances where it is not needed however such as when:
- It slows down processes - sometimes leaders will need to give permission for a subordinate to do something. If this thing is time conscious and the leader is not available to give their ascent, the whole process could suffer.
- It oppresses people - when a leader is an oppressive one and acts in such a way that their subordinates suffer, that leadership is not needed.
- Subordinates are fine without it - sometimes workers have the necessary skills and experience to operate independently without a leader. In such a case, a leader is not needed.
In conclusion, while a leader is quite important in many ways, there can be situations where it is best that they are not used.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/24150490.</em>
Answer:
Instructions are below.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Each unit of output requires 0.07 direct labor-hours. The direct labor rate is $8.70 per direct labor-hour. The production budget calls for producing 6,000 units in February and 6,500 units in March.
We need to determine the total direct labor hours needed for each month.
February:
Total direct labor hours= 6,000*0.07= 420 hours
Total direct labor costs= 420*8.7= $3,654
March:
Total direct labor hours= 6,500*0.07= 455 hours
Total direct labor costs= 455*8.7= $3,958.5
Answer: Production orientation
Explanation: It refers to a strategy when the company focuses only to provide the best quality product in the market without taking into consideration the preference of the customers.
In the given case, Steel makers are focusing on making their business process the best in market so that they can gain a competitive advantage.
Thus, from the above we can conclude that the correct option is C.
Answer:
in terms of which is worse, "monopoly" is bad for both the consumers and the industry, while a competitive market is good for consumers and the industry alike, however, it is not "perfect". there has to be regulations and a sort of a control.
anyhow, a monopoly is bad then a single corporation has the total power from the supply side and this can lead to unnecessary price increases, lower quality products, industrial malpractices, national level frauds, etc, etc...
because of this, we always say a monopoly is bad, even if it is a government sector monopoly. many nations have laws and rules to ensure no monopolies will arise.
in USA, we call such rules, Anti-trust laws.
Explanation:
Answer:
All of the choices are correct.
Explanation:
GAAP is an acronym for Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, it comprises of the accounting standard, procedures and principles used by public institutions in the United States of America. The U.S GAAP is issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and adopted by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
GAAP includes each of the following pronouncements:
Statements of Financial Accounting Standards, Accounting Research Bulletins, Accounting Principles Board Opinions.
For external reporting purposes, United States of America, Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) allows companies to use only the traditional format of the income statement.
United States of America, Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) is the accounting principles, procedures and standard issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and adopted by the United States of America, Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
When accountants prepare and compile financial statements for public firms, it must be in line with United States of America, Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP).
