1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Elina [12.6K]
3 years ago
12

Why did america want control of the oregon country?

History
1 answer:
marusya05 [52]3 years ago
3 0
<span><span>Oregon Country, 1846<span><span>  Major Land Purchases Treaty of Paris Louisiana Purchase Red River Basin Florida Texas Annexation Oregon Country Mexican Cession Gadsden Purchase Alaska Hawaii States Emerge Expansion Concentration </span> </span></span><span>Oregon Country was a portion of land between the Pacific Ocean and the Rocky Mountains in the northwest portion of the present-day United States. In 1818, the United States and Britain agreed to a "joint occupation" of Oregon, allowing citizens of both countries to settle there. Over the next several decades, American and British settlers came to Oregon for different reasons. The British came mostly for the fur trade, while Americans came to be missionaries or to start farms or larger settlements. By the 1840s, Americans outnumbered their British compatriots, and the fur trade was no longer as lucrative as it had once been. American expansionists — among them President James Polk — were increasingly looking to end the joint occupation and claim Oregon for America alone. Finding themselves in a weakened position, the British agreed to negotiate.

Negotiations between the United States and Britain over the Oregon Country began in the summer of 1845. Because any states that would eventually be formed out of the territory would be free states, anti-slavery Northerners were strongly in favor of acquiring as much of the territory as possible. America's first proposal was that the territory be divided roughly in half, with the boundary drawn at the 49th parallel. When the British rejected this offer, expansionist Northerners called for greater American aggression, using the slogan "Fifty-Four Forty or Fight!" ("Fifty-four Forty" referred to the latitude line marking the northernmost boundary of the territory.) Pro-slavery Southern Congressmen, however, made it clear that they would not support a war with Britain over the territory.

Britain did not want to go to war over the issue either, and in 1846, the two countries reached an agreement to divide the territory at the 49th parallel. Oregon Country would later become the modern-day states of Oregon, Washington, and Idaho, as well as portions of Montana and Wyoming.</span></span>
You might be interested in
I need to know the answer
LuckyWell [14K]

The 1828 Tariff of Abominations was opposed by the Southern states that contended that the tariff was unconstitutional. The Southern states whose livelihoods were being harmed firstly by having to pay higher prices on goods the South did not produce, and secondly increasing taxes on British imports made it difficult for Britain to pay for the cotton they imported from the South. Some New England industries were also opposed to the bill because it included the clause by which the taxes on raw materials increased considerably.

5 0
3 years ago
A 1913 California law enforced Japanese Americans to..
DENIUS [597]
A 1913 California law forced Japanese Americans to : Sell their land
3 0
3 years ago
What does John O’Sullivan mean when he says national birth?
Westkost [7]
<span>He means that our national birth was the beginning of a new history, the formation and progress of a political system and not tried that it separates us from the past and it only connects us with the future; and till now as you greet the whole development of the natural rights of man, in the moral life, politics, and national that we can confidently suppose that our country is destined for being the great nation of future</span>
3 0
3 years ago
6. What do these medieval items have in common?
ANTONII [103]

they all belong to a manor peasant

6 0
3 years ago
Which statement regarding tokugawa leyasu exemplifies absolutism
alexandr402 [8]
Ahy trained historians of Japan in the Western world was too small to sustain such an enterprise. Although that number has grown, the general editors have thought it best to draw on Japanese specialists for contributions in areas where they retain a clear authority. In such cases the act of translation itself involves a form of editorial cooperation that requires the skills of a trained historian whose name deserves acknowledgment.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which answer best summarizes Britain's policies toward the American colonists after the French and Indian War? (5 points) The co
    11·2 answers
  • Who were the Blackshirts?
    11·1 answer
  • Which resource is most common across the country
    5·2 answers
  • 1. Which most clearly contributed to the rise of dictators in Europe and Asia during the 1930s?
    10·1 answer
  • The blank department is tasked with promoting the presidents foreign policies regarding other sovereign nations.
    7·1 answer
  • What can third parties hope to attain by running for office and/or promoting their political ideology?
    15·2 answers
  • Question 1 of 10
    5·1 answer
  • Under the Sun King, intendants
    6·1 answer
  • What is one way the Progressive Era reform outlined in this diagram has affected U.S. politics?
    7·1 answer
  • How was education different for Aztec boys and girls?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!