Anyone able to pay the transportation costs of the worker who was hired could use the Headrights system.
<h3>What does this system guarantee?</h3>
- Guarantee the domain of land.
- Guarantee the freedom to use the land.
Headrights was a system that promoted people who could pay for their workers' transport during working hours. In this way, the worker was able to optimize his money because he did not have to pay for transport.
The employer also had advantages, as this allowed him to receive land from the government.
50 acres were offered to employers in other regions and 100 acres to those already residing in the region.
Learn more about Headrights:
brainly.com/question/13481206
#SPJ1
1. Santa Anna characterizes the mission of the Mexican Army as solely to liberate Texas from the rebels, thereby bringing to an end the independence declared by Texas from Mexico.
- However, the atrocities that Santa Anna visited against the Texans during the war show that the Mexican Army under his charge came to finish off the Texans. Many soldiers that fled the intensive fighting at Alamo were pursued and massacred.
2. The mission of the Mexican Army was characterized as that of liberation. This does not compare to José Enrique de la Peña's language.
- In de la Peña's account of the war, he stated that the American commanders were killed in the fighting. This account contradicted the fact that the commanders were massacred when they fled from the battleground.
3. The lengthy accounts of de Peña blame Santa Anna for the atrocities at Alamo and other battlegrounds.
- This conclusion is based on the fact that de Peña reported that Commander Davy Crockett did not die fighting but was ordered to be killed by Santa Anna after surrendering in battle.
Thus, these accounts show that evil transpired during the Texas War of Independence with Mexico between October 1835 to April 1836.
Read more about the Texas War at brainly.com/question/20716935
Answer:
I would participate in protests
Explanation:
Answer:
private conformity; public conformity
Explanation:
Sherif's study type of comformity is likely the result of private conformity, while the one in Asch's study was public conformity. Private conformity is defined mind alteration or change that happens when a person take accepts the position taken by others privately or in seclusion. Public conformity is a superficial in nature, it is a change in the character or behavior under due observation. it has no corresponding change of opinion and occurs as a result of real/imagined group pressure. The situation in sherif's study is very ambiguous while Asch's study is not ambiguous
