Answer:
B. housing, transportation, and food
Explanation:
According to my research on basic economics and household spending habits, I can say that based on the information provided within the question it is housing, transportation, and food that make up three-quarters of the market basket. This is because these are the three categories that are considered necessities within a normal household. This is because housing provides shelter, food provides nutrition, and transportation provides a means of getting to work. Which are all necessities.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
FDR used the radio to speak to the American people. During this time, no individuals had television, movies were just becoming a large thing, so there was no other way to reach the American people all at once other than a news paper. So by FDR doing over the radio and speaking to the American citizens who almost all universally had radios or access to them, it built trust and it built a unity because it showed the American citizens he cares for them.
The claim is accurate since, in accordance with the self-expansion idea, the ability of partners to widen one another's identities is essential to a healthy partnership.
<h3>What is self-expansion theory?</h3>
Arthur Aron put forward the self-expansion idea, which is always applied to evaluate the upkeep of relationships, including familial, amicable, and amorous. In the context of relationships, "encompassing others in the self" is the primary method used by people to broaden their sense of self. Self-expansion is related to psychological concepts of self-efficacy, intrinsic motivation, self-actualization, and the self-improvement motivation since it is motivated by people's ability to achieve their goals. People in partnerships may feel far away and entirely distinct from the other person, or they may have psychological overlap, which is a strong sensation of oneness.
To know more about self-expansion, click here:
brainly.com/question/7395456
#SPJ4
Both of them thought they were doing the right thing for their country, France. Napoleon was a general and he thought that he was doing his best fighting for his country but without realizing it he was hurting the country at one point. His main focus was in warfare that he could not care any less for the rest of the ruling (reason behind the selling of Louisiana is 1803). Robespierre thought he could be a good leader for France and in a way challenge the French but he ended up hurting and murdering many people by not being judged in the correct way. They hurt the French thinking they were doing more well than harm. <span />
