The statement from the dissenting opinion of tinker v. des moines court decision that best supports the reasoning that the conduct of the student protesters was not within the protection of the free speech clause of the first amendment is :
In cox v. Louisiana, the court clearly stated that the rights of free speech and assembly "do not mean that everyone with opinion or beliefs to express may address a group at any public place at any time
hope this helps
C. rhetorical
Explanation:
A rhetorical question is a question (such as "How could I be so stupid?") that's asked merely for effect with no answer expected. The answer may be obvious or immediately provided by the questioner.
Answer:
you might want to italicize the questions, like <em>why do so many people follow conspiracy theories </em>and <em>what makes a conspiracy believable?</em>
Explanation:
Answer:
Is there an example you can show?
Explanation:
The answer to your question would be that the literary device that enables readers to have mulitiple interpreations of a word, phrase, or event is the following one: ambiguity. That is, the correct option would be C.
Ambiguity, also known as fallacy of ambiguity, is a word, phrase, or statement which contains more than meaning. These words or statements lead to confusion. For instance, "Yesterday I rode a horse with sunglasses" is ambigous because it can be taken as if the one with the sunglasses was the horse.
