All categories

3 years ago

How did the k-abc differ from the stanford-binet and wechsler tests?

1 answer:

3 0

The K-ABC is different from the wechsler test and stanford-binet because it was designed to measure several distinct aspects of intelligence. The K-ABC test is just designed to measure several distinct aspects of intelligence of human or students who are taking the test. So the answer in this question is, it was designed to measure several distinct aspects of intelligence.

You might be interested in

Evidence-based HR refers to the practice of initiating disciplinary action against employees only in the presence of clear and d

NeTakaya

Answer:

This statement is False.

Explanation:

<u>Evidence-based Human Resources</u> is the practice of evaluating decisions based on real data, experience, research and/or expert opinions in order to obtain the best outcome from such decision. It consists of gathering all reliable and related sources of information regarding a specific situation to analyze it and make an informed decision. Of course, this does not mean that there will not be any mistakes, but <u>Evidence-based HR</u> helps in getting rid of biases and assumptions that affect decision-making.

7 0

2 years ago

In a flexible budget, when the activity declines, the total variable cost also declines.

Triss [41]

That statement is false.
Variable cost is the type of cost that incurred everytime a product is being produced. In flexible budget, the total budget will be adjusted to the amount of changes in volume or activity, which make the variable cost pretty much the same even though the activity is declined

4 0

3 years ago

Determine the inventory cost using the (a) first-in, first-out (FIFO) method; (b) last-in, first-out (LIFO) method; and (c) weig

masha68 [24]

Answer:

(a) Cost of inventory sold using FIFO method = $179,280

(b) Cost of inventory sold using LIFO method = $188,700

Explanation:

Note: This question is not complete. The complete question is therefore provided before answering the question. See the attached pdf file for the complete question.

The explanation of the answers is now provided as follows:

Units of inventory sold = Units available for sale - Ending physical inventory units = 45 – 14 = 31

(a) first-in, first-out (FIFO) method

Under FIFO, inventory purchased first is sold first. Therefore, we have:

Cost of inventory sold using FIFO = 12 units at $5,400 each from Jan. 1 + 18 units at $6,000 each from Aug. 7 Purchase + 1 unit at $6,480 from Dec. 11 Purchase = (12 * $5,400) + (18 * $6,000) + (1 * $6,480) = $64,800 + $108,000 + $6,480 = $179,280

(b) last-in, first-out (LIFO) method

Under LIFO, inventory purchased last is sold first. Therefore, we have:

Cost of inventory sold using LIFO = 15 unit at $6,480 each from Dec. 11 Purchase + 16 units at $6,000 each from Aug. 7 Purchase = (15 * $6,480) + (16 * $6,000) = $97,200 + $96,000 = $188,700

(c) weighted average cost method (round per-unit cost to two decimal places and your final answer to the nearest whole dollar).

Under the weighted average cost method, the cost of goods available for sale is divided by the number of units available for sale to obtain average cost per unit. This is then used to multiply the total units sold to obtain the cost of inventory sold as follows:

Weighted average cost per unit = Cost of goods available for sale / Units available for sale = $270,000 / 45 = $6,000

Cost of inventory sold using weighted average cost method = Units of inventory sold * Weighted average cost per unit = 31 * $6,000 = $186,000

Download pdf

6 0

3 years ago

Workco must have the following number of workers available during the next three months: month 1, 20; month 2, 16; month 3, 25.

GaryK [48]

Answer:

Total least possibe cost in three months is $4.800 + $2.800 + $4.000 = $11.600

Explanation:

Let us assume that Workco does not have the option to have less number of workers than 20, 16 & 25 in the first, second and third months respectively.

Month 1 : Since there are zero workers at the start, the cost of First month can easily be calculated as cost of hiring 20 workers and salary of 20 workers i.e (20*100)+(20*140) = $4800

Month 2 : Since number of workers required is less than month 1, workco has the option of firing maximum of 4 workers to bring down number of workers to 16. The decision of whether to fire the workers depend on 2 factors :

a) Cost of firing + Cost of hiring - If we see, cost of firing + hiring is ($50 + $100) = $150 which is greater than the salary of worker of $140/month

b) Number of workers required in 3rd Month - It is important to note that the number of workers needed in 3rd month is the highest i.e more than the 1st month also which effectively means that we will have to rehire all the workers fired in month two and then hire 5 more workers (Difference between number of workers in 1st and 3rd month).

Since cost of hiring + firing is more than the salary, it makes sense to not fire any worker in month 2.

Considering the above points, cost in month two is 20*140 = $2800

Month 3 : Nom of workers at the end of month two is 20 and requirement is 25. So Workco will have to hire 5 more workers costing him (5*100)=$500 and then pay salary to 25 workers (25*140)= $3500 taking the total cost in month 3 to $500 + $3500 = $4000

So, total least possibe cost in three months is $4800 + $2800 + $4000 = $11600

7 0

3 years ago

You have a credit card and the average balance on that card, year after year, is $4,000. The credit card company charges 21% ann

sergiy2304 [10]

The answer is b. 840$

4 0

3 years ago