Hii! I’m going to give you 2 in case if you don’t like the other pair.
An observation uses your five senses, while an inference is a conclusion we draw based on our observations. The differences are that an observation is objective and an inference is subjective. They’re important by telling both differences, because one is visually seeing something/ or knowing, and the other one is guessing.
Option 2:
Inferences are progress of reaching a conclusion about something from a known fact. Observations are what someone perceives or notices.
Hope this helped:)
Answer:
1. Where, messages, receive? - Where are messages received?
2. How, newspapers, deliver? - How are newspapers delivered?
Third conditional. If the students hadn't been late for the exam, they would have passed.
Second conditional. If the weather weren't so cold, we could go to the beach.
Third conditional. If she had had a laptop with her, she could have emailed me.
First conditional. If she doesn't go to the meeting, I won't go either.
Second conditional. If Lucy had enough time, she would travel more.
Explanation:
The first part of this question concerns the passive voice. <u>When we use the passive voice, the subject is not the one performing the action expressed by the verb. In the present tense, the passive voice consists of the verb to be plus the past participle of the main verb.</u>
The second part of this question concerns conditionals. <u>Sentences in the first conditional use an if-clause in the simple present. The consequence is expressed in the simple future. In the second conditional, the if-clause uses the simple past, while the consequence uses would/could/might plus the main verb. Finally, the third conditional uses the past perfect in the if-clause. The consequence uses would/could/might + have + past participle of the main verb.</u>
Here's what Swaniker says about this relationship: ''When societies have strong institutions, the difference that one good leader can make is limited, but when you have weak institutions, then just one good leader <span>can make or break that country.'' Since he believes that Africa has extremely weak institutions, starting from the judiciary system and constitutions to many more others. He believes that, with the right leader, Africa can undergo serious positive changes. At the same time, a corrupted or incompetent leader can do so much harm, since there are no properly functioning institutions to stop him.</span>
She is a savage that is why
