Comparing and contrasting European colonization on East Africa and Central and South Africa shows:
East Africa:
- Trade gave them access to new food crops, textiles and metal
- Slave trade was not as much as other parts of Africa.
South Africa:
- Slavery was rampant.
- Impoverishment of South and Central Africans and wealth to Europeans.
<h3>How was colonization in Southern Africa different from Eastern Africa?</h3>
The colonization in Southern Africa was overall negative as Africans were taken as slaves and treated as inferior to Europeans who took most of the wealth. This was especially the case in Angola, Mozambique, and South Africa.
The East Africans were however not subjugated to much slavery and the trade in textiles and metal brought some prosperity.
Find out more on colonization in Africa at brainly.com/question/1395188
#SPJ1
It increased 900 import tariffs by an average of 40% to 48%. Most economists blame it for worsening the Great Depression. It also contributed to the start of World War II. In June 1930, Smoot-Hawley raised already high U.S. tariffs on foreign agricultural imports.
Hope this helped, please mark brainliest. :)
Answer:
C. The new laws must obey the US Constitution
Explanation:
If a state law does not obey the US Constitution, it can be taken down in court.
Answer:
Capitalism
Explanation:
In capitalism owners control the production and income so it is more focused on competition, also this keeps the government from controlling business
These are the real philosophical questions. We indulge in these thoughts like distant memory.
