Answer: Thomas Jefferson was inspired by John Locke's ideas.
Explanation:
(he defended the claim that men are by nature free and equal against claims that God had made all people naturally subject to a monarch.) John Locke originally considered the idea of "Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness". Though this is where most of his inspiration came from, he was also influenced by the "Bill of rights" and the "Magna Carta". Hope this helps and wish you luck.
Language condemning the slave trade was removed. In the original draft of the Declaration of Independence of 1776, Thomas Jefferson wrote a passage where he condemned slavery, and caused great controversy among the delegates. Jefferson saids that he was fought a bloody war for the liberty of the Colonies, and he tought that people shoudn't be trade or slavished by other people, and he call to people to give freedom to all the slaves in the new country. This caused great controversy among the delegates and finally, this part of the original Declaration of Independence was suppressed and replaced with a strange passage of the King George.
Answer:
The "CIVILIZING MISSION" argument
Explanation:
Colonialism is a practice of domination, which involves the subjugation of one people to another. One of the difficulties in defining colonialism is that it is hard to distinguish it from imperialism. Frequently the two concepts are treated as synonyms. Like colonialism, imperialism also involves political and economic control over a dependent territory. The etymology of the two terms, however, provides some clues about how they differ. The term colony comes from the Latin word colonus, meaning farmer. This root reminds us that the practice of colonialism usually involved the transfer of population to a new territory, where the arrivals lived as permanent settlers while maintaining political allegiance to their country of origin. Imperialism, on the other hand, comes from the Latin term imperium, meaning to command. Thus, the term imperialism draws attention to the way that one country exercises power over another, whether through settlement, sovereignty, or indirect mechanisms of control.
The legitimacy of colonialism has been a longstanding concern for political and moral philosophers in the Western tradition. At least since the Crusades and the conquest of the Americas, political theorists have struggled with the difficulty of reconciling ideas about justice and natural law with the practice of European sovereignty over non-Western peoples. In the nineteenth century, the tension between liberal thought and colonial practice became particularly acute, as dominion of Europe over the rest of the world reached its zenith. Ironically, in the same period when most political philosophers began to defend the principles of universalism and equality, the same individuals still defended the legitimacy of colonialism and imperialism. One way of reconciling those apparently opposed principles was the argument known as the “civilizing mission,” which suggested that a temporary period of political dependence or tutelage was necessary in order for “uncivilized” societies to advance to the point where they were capable of sustaining liberal institutions and self-government.
