I believe the answer is: <span>person-situation controversy
</span><span>person-situation controversy refers to a debate in the field of psychology which argue whether a person or the situation play a more crucial factor in determining a person's behavior.
</span>
Experts who support the 'person' side in this controversy believed that people with bad personality traits would always do bad behaviors regardless the situation they're in.
Experts who support the 'situation' side in this controversy believed that bad behaviors only occurs because the people are facing bad situations in their life.
Answer: A) Paternalism
Explanation:
This phenomenon is the effort of a group, organization, and political structures to abolish certain human freedoms under the pretext that it is the best decision at a certain moment. Paternalism is also evident in the relationship between parents and children, so we often witness how parents forbid certain things to children because they think they are bad. If they do not have to be, they are often the product of subjective observations. Many experts consider Paternalism a negative phenomenon because the hesitation of freedoms must never be the solution.
Pollution of the ocean and land. Humans cutting down natural trees. The building of roads and shelters etc..
Answer:
curiosity? are there any answers to choose from
Explanation:
I’m not 100 percent sure but it’s most likely answer choice A