There were many reasons for not unifying in one
political system:<span>
One of them was the geography, Greece contained many mountainous
terrains, valleys which were separated from each other, many islands where it
was easy to form new towns and settlement, giving birth to many power centers
instead of one
Another reason was the sense of heroism in Greece and to
fulfil that the great Mediterranean, they could sail to wherever they wanted in
the times of need resulting from any kind of crisis and this helped them
establish new colonies all over the Mediterranean.
<span>Third reason was the presence of aristocracy who denied the
establishment of a monarch and each city or state defended their independence.</span></span>
Cyrus the Great whole ruled the <span>Achaemenid Empire - He had huge tolerance that made him unify all tribes, languages, religion and cultures. His victory during the babylonian war gave him an advantage to take over the trade routes.
</span><span>Stephen of England had developed a diplomatic proposal to Friesland. In 1162 he conquered Friesland, but he died with a recalcitrant baron.
</span>
Caesar - He is one of the influencers who had proposed law in the country for the order of the people.
The point of view of the Lakota, Cheyenne, and Arapaho towards the land where they lived was one of protection and balance and differed from the points of view of the settlers and miners who only wanted to exploit the Earth's natural resources.
The inhabitants of America before the arrival of the Europeans were made up of thousands of indigenous cultures distributed throughout the territory. In the case of North America, there were indigenous cultures such as the Cheyennes, Arapahos, and Lakota.
- The Cheyenne were a nation of Native Americans who inhabit the Great Plains of the United States.
- The Arapahos were an Amerindian community that historically lived east of the Great Plains of the current states of Colorado and Wyoming of what is now part of the United States.
- The Lakotas or Lakhotas are people who live on the northern banks of the Missouri River. They are part of the Sioux tribe, historically they had been a nomadic group although currently, they lead a sedentary way of life.
The vision that these indigenous communities had about the land in which they lived was to live in harmony and balance with the land, it was not a possession but an entity superior to them that should be protected and cared for.
On the other hand, the vision of the settlers and miners on the land was one of extraction and economic use. They wanted to get as much wealth out of it as possible in different ways. For example, they exploited the mineral mines, cut down trees to sell wood, they killed animals to sell their meat and skins, among others.
Learn more in: brainly.com/question/8632762
Answer:
No, Qin Shih Huang Ti, was the emperor. No more was feudalism know legalism. Fell due to weak son. unification of china politically and economically, great wall, unified language, roads etc.
Explanation:
When the debates over the 3/5th Compromise was had, in relation to the above options, the answer is none of the above.
<h3>What happened during the debate for the 3/5h compromise?</h3>
The delegates from the Southern part of the states argued that enslaved people should be treated as people if it came to voting and representation.
They did this to ensure that they would have more representation in Congress even though their population was less than the North.
Find out more on the 3/5th Compromise at brainly.com/question/744051.