To be truthful, I don't think that's actually a word... Sorry. :(
I hope you enjoy life! :D
<span>The point of view London uses in "The Call of the Wild" is the third person limited omniscient.
</span> Omniscient means that the narrator has access to character's thoughts and feelings
Buck’s point of view, for the most part; because London focuses on the character of Buck. He explains the <span>the dog's thoughts and feelings.</span> <span>
the novel also shifts briefly into </span>John Thornton’s point of view during his wager involving Buck’s ability to pull a heavy sled
Answer:
It can be inferred that Allen believes the case of flag-burning can be handled just like any other case and all the opinions on the topic are all welcome.
The text evidence is "not treating the flag-burning case like the simple case it is".
Explanation:
Based on the given lines, it can be inferred that Allen shared his opinion and he believes that the specific case could be analyzed in a manner that is similar to those used for other similar cases. This is based on the line in the text as quoted above. The suggestions from everyone on the specific issue can be tabled and considered.
