1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
stepan [7]
3 years ago
13

The British and the colonists had many conflicts in the time before the American Revolution. What conclusion can be made about w

hy so much conflict occurred in Boston?
A) The king wanted to control Boston because the wealthiest colonists lived there.
B) The British did not like Boston because most colonists there did not own slaves.
C) The people of Boston were taxed by the king, while Southern colonies were not.
D) The king was enforcing more policies in Boston as an example to all the colonies.
History
2 answers:
Lesechka [4]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Option D.

Explanation:

The king was enforcing more policies in Boston as an example to all the colonies, is the right answer.

The British monarchy imposed heavy taxes on its colonies in the Americas. Tensions grow high in Boston in the early phase of the 1770s as more than 2,000 soldiers from Britain entered the area to enforce the tax legislation such as the Stamp and the Townshend Acts. In response to this, the American colonists rebelled against the new taxes and gave the slogan "No taxation without representation.” The main reason why this much conflicts occurred in Boston was that the king was making more orders in Boston to set an example for other colonies.

mel-nik [20]3 years ago
5 0
<span>Okay, as I read the history, the Stamp Act and the Townshend Acts were both intended to tax the colonies to help Britain pay off it's debts from the War. The Declaration did not impose any new taxes, but justified making the colonies more dependent on the Crown/British government, so I interpret that as "justification" for the taxes. It's not a word that was used at the time, but our interpretation of it in our own time.(The answer is D) Your welcome!</span>
You might be interested in
The relationship between two variables is positive when
Viktor [21]

The relationship between two variables is "positive when  one variable increases and the other increases" and the relationship between two variables is "negative when one variable increases and the other decreases".

<u>Answer:</u> Option C

<u>Explanation:</u>

"Variables" are the characteristics or properties that change or could be changed and responsible for variations in results. A variable is any factor, trait, or condition which occurs in differing amounts or types, usually independent, dependent, and controlled are kinds of variables preferred in any stream.

"Positive correlation" occurs when two variables move in same direction, for an instance like when one variable increases and the other increase or when one variable decrease and the other decreases. While "negative correlation" take place when two variables move in different directions like when one variable increases and the other decreases or when one variable decreases and the other increases.

5 0
3 years ago
Which describes Haiti's leadership in the 1850s?
kykrilka [37]

Answer:

Under imperial rule

Explanation:

In this question, we are to select which of the options best describe the leadership style in Haiti in the 1950s

The correct answer here is that Haiti was under imperial rule

When we talk of the 1850s, we mean a period in the 19th century that spanned 1850-1859

During this period, Haiti was an empire.

An empire is like a king-ruled entity but the king here takes the title of an emperor and as such the style of leadership is an imperial one as the emperor would be referred to as the imperial majesty.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Is the the equivalent of the "Party"?<br><br>is there the equivalent of the "Proles"?​
makvit [3.9K]
Everyone that is below the established level of what can be called “Elite” is what the Proles are, in '1984'. The proletariat, by definition, is someone who works to survive. Therefore, anyone who has to work, to earn a living and survive, is Prole.
4 0
3 years ago
How did the environment affect early human life?
shutvik [7]

pls follow me

Explanation:

The better climate meant more resources and vegetation available for humans; therefore, the small mobile groups could begin to reside in one area. Agriculture was a turning point in early human life because humans began to alter their surroundings for survival

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How no answer to these who sorry
lana [24]
Hmm is little tricky
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which of the following were goals of Reconstruction? Check all of the boxes that apply.
    11·1 answer
  • Which was NOT a reason that people left their homeland and migrated to the United States in the mid- 1800's?
    11·1 answer
  • Which is the best example of natural selection?
    13·2 answers
  • The migration of ____ during the Neolithic era led to the diffusion of ___
    14·1 answer
  • Witch party strengthened as a result of the Dred Scott decision
    13·1 answer
  • Which is an example of a type of crime scene search pattern?
    8·2 answers
  • Into what language did Islamic scholars translate Greek, Persian, and Indian literature and
    7·1 answer
  • Why did the Spartans create a strict military society? *
    12·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP. i’ll give brainliest if you want!
    12·2 answers
  • As noted in the introduction to studying this section on the Middle Ages – it was often referred to as the Dark Ages, but time h
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!