Answer:
The only dominant strategy in this game is for__Alex_ to choose__Right___ .
The outcome reflecting the unique Nash equilibrium in this game is as follows:
Alex chooses__Right____ and Becky chooses__Left_____ .
Explanation:
The game theory of the Nash equilibrium achieves the optimal outcome of a game because Alex and Becky are not incentivized to deviate from their chosen strategies after considering the opponent's choice. Neither of these two players can increase their payoff by choosing an action different from their current strategic action. Thus, this action profile achieves a Nash equilibrium for the two players because there exists randomization in the game.
<span><span>1. </span>Discuss the following statement: "Corporations are not
really run by their owners." Corporations are run by everyone who works
for the corporation and without everyone working together, it will not run
smoothly and bring in revenue.
</span>
<span>
2. Why might an investor choose to become a partner in a limited partnership
instead of purchasing the stock of an open corporation? If an investor decided
to join in a limited partnership instead of purchasing the stock on an open
corporation they would have less to do with the business side as they would in
an open corporation. When an investor joins in a limited partnership they have
less management responsibility and little to no liability besides their initial
investment.
</span>
<span>
3. Is growth a good thing for all firms? How does management know when a firm
is ready to grow? Growth is not a good thing for all firms. Depending on what a
company is looking to achieve long term, the financial assets they have now to
achieve their growth and other goals are all subject to what the company is
able to do with the finances and staffing they have. When a corporation is
trying to decide whether or not they should grow, management will examine all
aspects of the company to make sure they align with the growth plan.
</span>
<span>
4. If you were to start a business, which ownership form would you choose? What
factors might affect your choice? If I were to start a business, I would
probably choose a limited liability company (LLC) as the ownership form and
structure. An LLC is where the members within the company are not held personally
liable for the company’s debts or liabilities. Think ownership form works well
if you were to join forces an open up a business with a friend or family member.
An LLC keeps the tax side of the business easier as allowing the individuals to
be self-proprietors. When considering factors that may change this decision
they would include: who I am going in business with, what I am in business for,
my end goals, current goals and current financial status. </span>
Answer:
Taylorism
Explanation:
Taylorism, often referred to as Scientific Management, was the first theory of management to focus specifically on analyzing and optimizing workflows. These theories of process optimization helped drive the Fordist shift to mass production which occurred in the early part of the 20th Century. Taylorism can be boiled down to 4 principal points: The method of doing a task should be informed by a scientific investigation of the task , employees should be selected and carefully trained for tasks ,tasks should have detailed instructions and should be subject to supervision and management should evaluate tasks and formulate optimized approaches for the workers to follow .
Some forms of analysis might be done by timing how long it takes a worker to do a task, others by weighing raw materials. Process analysis, for Taylor, had to look at both the minutiae of the process composition and the detail of the physical acts required to complete the process. The elements of process improvement Taylor advocated for were successful in regards to processing materials; changing the way steel was cut and patenting that process. Yet, during his life, Taylor struggled to achieve quite the same success improving the efficiency of workers. Taylorism was first scientifically understanding how the production process worked and then supporting the managers of a workplace to intimately train workers to work at maximum efficiency. This way, the means towards higher returns is paved with a well-managed, harmonious relationship between managers and workers. In theory, this would have been a much more sustainable model for an organization. But despite that promise, people, although genetically similar, are intrinsically unique and complex. Aligning different minds and ushering people to a new way of working (from individual craft, to standardized production), sometimes require more time and effort than bringing in a new piece of technology.
Answer:
a) Share price of company is $28.20.
b) So value of unlevered firm is $4.512 million.
Explanation:
a.
Share price = Value of debt / (160,000 - 110,000)
= $1,410,000 / 50,000
= $28.20
Share price of company is $28.20.
b.
VAlue of all equity firm = Number of share outstanding × Price per share
= 160,000 × $28.20
= $4.512 million
Value of levered firm is $4.512 million.
Since tax rate is zero, so value of levered firm equal to value of unlevered firm.
So value of unlevered firm is $4.512 million.
Answer:
a. True
Explanation:
The foreign exchange market is a market for converting the currency of one country into that of another country.
For example, the conversion of dollars of the United States of America can be converted into naira (Nigeria) at the foreign exchange market.
Efficient market school is the market school which argues that forward exchange rates do the best possible job for forecasting future spot exchange rates, so investing in exchange rate forecasting services would be a waste of time because it is impossible to have a consistent alpha generation on a risk adjusted excess returns basis as market prices are only affected by new informations.
The efficient market school also known as the efficient market hypothesis (EMH) is a hypothesis that states that asset (share) prices reflect all information and it is very much impossible to consistently beat the market.
Also, forward exchange rates are exchange rates controlling foreign exchange transactions at a specific future date or time.
