U put at much evidence u can on each page then u do what ever else u have to do
Answer:
Here are the options:
They are completely separate types of policy issues that do not affect one another.
Leaders must consider how one type of policy may affect the other since they relate.
The president and Senate are the only groups making decisions on these policy issues.
Officials are separated by which type of policy they work on and ignore the other type.
The correct answer is : Leaders must consider how one type of policy may affect the other since they relate.
Explanation: Domestic policy is a policy that relates directly to issues and activities within a country or nation and these issues are internal. It simply refers to how a nation or country conducts and runs its affairs. These issues are important in shaping and running the affairs of the society.
While foreign policy refers to the ways a government of a nation or country relates and runs its affairs in world politics. Foreign policy involves policies between two or more nations dealing with issues externally. Such issues include helping defenseless people or nations in times of war and natural disasters. Foreign affairs or policies also help in settling disputes among or between nations.
The Compromise of 1850 was an attempt to ease the differences between slaveholders and anti-slaveryholders regarding the status of the new states (option A)
<h3>What was the Compromise of 1850?</h3>
The Compromise of 1850 is the name given to a set of five bills passed by the United States Congress in September 1850.
These bills had the objective of appeasing the political confrontation between the slave states and the free states. However, the union of three new states and the status they took against slavery was a controversial issue that deepened the differences of thought.
Learn more about anti-slavery in: brainly.com/question/515785
They are valuable for the appointive procedure. The two gatherings fill in as a quite decent method for getting similarly invested individuals together. In the event that they were not there, it would be substantially harder to distinguish great competitors, motivate them to keep running for office, bolster them.
They fill in as a contradicting element to the intrigue gatherings. In the event that it were not for parties, the intrigue gatherings would be unopposed. The gatherings attempt to pull individuals together in expansive coalitions. The intrigue bunches attempt to pull them separated on single issues.
