1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
oksian1 [2.3K]
3 years ago
8

Arrange the events in the sequence in which they happened. Tiles The Soviet army enters Berlin. The Soviet army drives the Nazis

from Belarus and eastern Poland. Germany surrenders to the Allies. Hitler commits suicide.
History
2 answers:
motikmotik3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

The Soviet Army drives the Nazis from Belarus and eastern Poland.

The Soviet Army enters Berlin,

Hitler killed himself.

Germany surrenders to the Allies.

Explanation:

The end of World War II in the European territory saw the advance of the counter-attack of the Soviet Army who, after having resisted for several times the continuous attacks of the Nazi army finally broke the defenses line and advance gaining territory once occupied by Germany, like Poland and parts of Belarus.

The Soviet Army was the first army to entered Berlin followed from the other front by the Western Allies. When the armies entered Berlin Hitler, the Nazi leader decided to kill himself to avoid capture. That happened on the 30 of April and, a week later on the 8 of may, Germany presented its unconditional surrender.

I hope this answer helps you.

MissTica3 years ago
3 0
Soviets drive nazis out,
Soviets enter Berlin,
Hitler commits suicide,
Germany surrenders
You might be interested in
5 - Qual é o fundamento que pode ser
RideAnS [48]
The answer was dribble I believe
3 0
3 years ago
What parallels do you see between the role of thinkers, scientists, and artists in ancient Rome and in America today? Why do you
exis [7]
I discovered that a key moment in Roman history was a very little-discussed raid by pirates on the Port of Rome at Ostia.

Rome was at that point the dominant world superpower, and there was no state in the world that would ever have dared to attack Rome. But the Romans were attacked by a group of stateless desperados who set fire to the Port. The flames may well have been visible in Rome itself. And this sent a shockwave through Rome, because if pirates could strike that close to the imperial capital, nowhere was safe.

And in this panicky atmosphere - an atmosphere of panic, I might say, which was deliberately whipped up by ambitious politicians - the Roman people took a series of fatal steps, surrendering some of their liberties and some of their control over their government. And in doing so, they sewed the seeds of the destruction of their own democracy.

And the more I looked at that event, the more it seemed familiar to me and the parallel with 9/11 - and in particular the response to it.
4 0
4 years ago
Egypt and Nubia relied on the Nile river because it:
defon

Answer:

Gave them a lot of resources like water, good farming soil, and was believed it was a Sacred RIver for the Egyptians.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
What did the league of nations do when nations went to war?
NARA [144]

<span>United States of America refused to enter 1920 when Warren G. Harding came to the presidency, although, as we mentioned, Wilson was his promoter. Germany was denied entry, but joined in 1926, to leave again after Hitler's accession to power in 1933. The Soviet Union was also denied entry, acceded in 1934 and was Again expelled in 1939 Japan left in 1933 and Italy in 1936. In addition, the league never had the economic or military means to impose its resolutions. The thirties marked their ultimate failure. The aggressions of the fascist and militarist powers showed their inefficiency. The beginning of the Second World War meant the end of the first world organization of nations. Among the same peace treaties with which World War I ends, includes the creation of the League of Nations or League of Nations, which had US President Thomas W. Wilson as its great promoter</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Would you change places with a Native American in the 1500s? Why?​
vitfil [10]

Answer: No

Explanation: Because living in the 20th century has great things that the 1500s didn't have like technology. In the 1500s the Native Americas rapidly declined as well.According to Noble David Cook, a community of scholars has recently, albeit slowly, "been quietly accumulating piece by piece data on early epidemics in the Americas and their relation to the subjugation of native peoples."

Hope this helps!! Brainlist?

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Passive​ nondiscrimination, required by both the age discrimination in employment act and title vii of the civil rights act of​
    12·1 answer
  • How did a process used by Native Americans to settle disputes have an effect on American culture today?
    11·2 answers
  • 1. The superpowers planned to launch attacks over the ______.
    8·2 answers
  • Which photo shows a modern-day aqueduct?
    13·2 answers
  • 1. Brazil’s history differs from the history of most countries in South America because Brazil
    15·2 answers
  • I am an African by Thabo mbeki... CAN SOMEONE PLEASE SUMMARIZE THIS SPEECH FOR ME AM WRITING AND I DON'T UNDERSTAND IT​
    8·1 answer
  • Mohammad Gandhi nonviolent protest persuaded India to-
    10·1 answer
  • What belief drove the creation of the international Monetary Fund (IMF)?
    8·2 answers
  • ¿como se expreso la guerra en la vida cotidiana de los mexicas?​
    11·1 answer
  • Help w this please !!!
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!