Answer:
Hey there!
From 1810 to 1930, it is 1 billion people in 80 years.
From 1930 to 1975 it is 2 billion people in 45 years.
From 1975 to 1999 it is 2 billion people in 24 years.
From 2011 to 2025 it is 1 billion people in 14 years.
However, in 1975 to 1999, the population change was still the greatest.
Let me know if this helps :)
Answer:
not really
Explanation:
Narcissistic abuse is a type of emotional abuse where the abuser only cares about themselves, and may use words and actions to manipulate their partner's behavior and emotional state.. Effects of narcissistic abuse can vary depending on how long one can endure these types of relationships.
If you are to OJ Simpson, then no. His trial was not quick in any means.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
Creating social media profiles
Explanation:
Is expected that the users alreday have their own media profiles. Also, creating a profile does not garantee any interaction or engagement with other users, a platforms or a specified segment. The best way sto angage users to any product/media are to share content, angege key influencers, be in touch with the target subjects and broadcast relevant content.
The U.S. Supreme Court hands down its decision on Sanford v. Dred Scott, a case that intensified national divisions over the issue of slavery.
In 1834, Dred Scott, a slave, had been taken to Illinois, a free state, and then Wisconsin territory, where the Missouri Compromise of 1820 prohibited slavery. Scott lived in Wisconsin with his master, Dr. John Emerson, for several years before returning to Missouri, a slave state. In 1846, after Emerson died, Scott sued his master’s widow for his freedom on the grounds that he had lived as a resident of a free state and territory. He won his suit in a lower court, but the Missouri supreme court reversed the decision. Scott appealed the decision, and as his new master, J.F.A. Sanford, was a resident of New York, a federal court decided to hear the case on the basis of the diversity of state citizenship represented. After a federal district court decided against Scott, the case came on appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, which was divided along slavery and antislavery lines; although the Southern justices had a majority.
During the trial, the antislavery justices used the case to defend the constitutionality of the Missouri Compromise, which had been repealed by the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854. The Southern majority responded by ruling on March 6, 1857, that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional and that Congress had no power to prohibit slavery in the territories. Three of the Southern justices also held that African Americans who were slaves or whose ancestors were slaves were not entitled to the rights of a federal citizen and therefore had no standing in court. These rulings all confirmed that, in the view of the nation’s highest court, under no condition did Dred Scott have the legal right to request his freedom. The Supreme Court’s verdict further inflamed the irrepressible differences in America over the issue of slavery, which in 1861 erupted with the outbreak of the American Civil War.
