Answer:
The correct answer is oxymoron.
Explanation:
Oxymoron is a type of figurative language used when trying to illustrate a rhetoric point.
Here, it is obvious that Queen Elizabeth had a purpose for saying this quote.
What she <u><em>did not</em></u> do was compare two objects (simile or metaphor), give inanimate objects human qualities (personification), use words of noises (onomatopoeia), or use words that start with the same letters (alliteration.)
Therefore, t he correct answer is oxymoron.
Hope this helps! :D
Answer:
Both push a group to the periphery of society. It creates "the haves" and "the hand nots." Both can create a misplaced sense of guilt or shame. They deny society of the best that the isolated group can share. They leave a group short suited, and can create a sense of conflict.
A character we can share is Jay Gatsby, who was able to partially shape his identity as a millionaire to the public eye, as further explained below.
<h3>Gatsby's identity</h3>
Jay Gatsby, from the novel "The Great Gatsby," was both able and unable to shape his identity. Originally extremely poor, Gatsby was able to make a lot of money through criminal activities. He also came up with a story about his past, but would not share it with everyone.
The general public knew Gatsby to be a millionaire, attended his parties, etc. So far, he was successful in shaping his identity. But the mystery surrounding his fortune and himself made people suspicious. And, even when he did share his fake story about his past, some things sounded too scripted to be true.
In the end, the truth about him surfaces and he loses the love of his life. For that reason, we can say Gatsby was both able and unable to shape his identity.
Learn more about Jay Gatsby here:
brainly.com/question/3391814
#SPJ1
Answer:
yup
Explanation:
because a dialoge is when two people are having a cinversation unlike monologue which is when a person is taking to himself.
Answer:
The primary message of Ray Bradbury's short story "The Veldt " concerns the dangers of overreliance on technology. Bradbury presents a cautionary tale of how technology can completely consume a household and drive a significant wedge between parents and children. In this short story, the author is trying to warn us of future dangers of technological innovation by creating an image of a family living in an automated house in the futuristic world. In this story, Ray Bradbury is trying to say that, in the future, technology might take over humanity if nothing is done about it now.
Explanation:
The story talks about this very often if you really read it.
