The answer would be : <span>c. chemical weathering.
Hope this helps !
Photon</span>
<u>Answer:</u>
A "small mountain stream" will have a<u> greater</u> competence and a <u>lower</u> capacity than the "Mississippi River".
<u>Explanation:</u>
- Streams flowing down a mountain tend to have more kinetic energy and momentum than the rivers flowing through plains.
- This increases their competence but at the same time, drains their capacity to convert themselves into larger streams.
- Most of the Mississippi River's course happens to pass through plains.
- That is why the Mississippi River has less competence yet more capacity than a "small mountain stream".
Mexico City: Gulf of California (Mar de Cortes), Gulf of Mexico, San Juan River and lake Chapala
New York: Arctic Ocean, Lake Ontario, lake Erie, Niagara River, Lake Champlain, St, Lawrence River, Genessee River
Paris: Seine, Canal Saint-Martin, Lac des Minimes, Lac Daumesnil, Bassin de la Villette
Tokyo: Meguro River, Sumida River, Kyunaka River, Lake Okutama, Tokyo Bay, Arakawa River, Tama River
Answer:
By correct territorial planning including natural hazards prevention and international accords regarding mitigation and adaptation to climate change.
Explanation:
Natural hazards cant be controlled, we cannot know for sure when an earthquake will occur and an eruption cannot be stopped, but there are still things societies can do to prepare and increase the resilience towards this kind of riks.
Trough territorial planning (if done correctly) societies can prepare well, for example, a city located at a high-risk zone of volcano eruption can set an alarm system to alert citizens to when it would be safe to leave the area. A seismic center can be installed to study the tectonic activity and establish high-risk zones.
Regarding climate change, there needs to be an integration of the different countries to the international accords toward climate change so that natural hazards can be mitigated no only locally but globally.
If done correctly estates can receive the impact of a natural hazard and still function correctly. Making high amounts of preparations and funding natural risk mitigation is justified if we look back at past catastrophes such as Katrina Hurricane or Haiti Earthquake and quantify the damage done.
The answer is B!! If it’s not let me know
