Answer:
Answer is option b i.e. large lot sizes to save on setup costs and to gain quantity discounts.
Explanation:
The just-in-time partnership is a Japanese management strategy that increases efficiency by minimizing the inventory to manufacture products with zero defects. Toyota was the first to use this strategy to increase the quality of the manufactured product by reducing wastes and increasing productivity. This strategy does not include large lot sizes to save on setup costs but rather focuses on buying only the required amount of inventory which is required for the production. Hence, the answer is option b.
Answer:
[(Accounts receivable at the beginning of the year + $138,000) - $144,000] - cash realizable value at the beginning of the year
Explanation: The question is incomplete but just apply the missing figures: [(Accounts receivable at the beginning of the year + Sales on account - Collections on account - write off) - bad debt] - cash realizable value at the beginning of the year
[(Accounts receivable at the beginning of the year + $390,000 - $230,000 - $22,000) - $144,000] - cash realizable value at the beginning of the year
Answer:
160,000 units
Explanation:
Step 1 : Determine the Sales Mix
Bramble : Standard
60000 : 40000
3 : 2
Step 2 : Determine the Overall Break even Point
Break even Point = Fixed Cost ÷ Contribution per unit
= $2400000 ÷ $30
= 80,000
Step 3 : Determine break-even point for Standards
Standards Break even point = 80,000 x 2
= 160,000 units
Thus,
Bramble Corp would sell 160,000 units of Standards at the break-even point
Answer:
1- B. Expense will be $140,000 and liability will be $250,000
2- d. $250,000
3- d. $250,000
Explanation:
The expense will be $140,000 which is calculated by year 1 and year 2 percent filled. The calculation is as follows:
Year 2 liability : $1,000,000 * 25% = $250,000
Year 1 liability : $1,000,000 * 11% = $110,000
Year 2 expense = $140,000.
Answer:
Lessens; Less.
Explanation:
Porsche has enhanced power over buyers because its strong reputation makes buyers more willing to pay a premium price. This lessens rivalry, since buyers become less price-sensitive. This mostly happens in premium end product where customers want to pay as much brand want to charge, where customers are not much concerned about the other brands, they have to have the products of certain brands at any cost which lessens the rivalry because customers are very much less price sensitive. As we have seen here for Porsche, same is the case with Apple, where customers want to pay higher for its iPhone and McBooks.
