Answer: Yes. He needs to disclose that he used another name for the previous business.
Explanation:
The licensing authority needs to know any of Paul's past history that could cast any judgement on his character so as to measure his integrity as real estate associates have to abide by certain ethics.
He therefore needs to disclose that he went by the name John when he owned the lawn service company to enable the licensing authority to research his activities whilst he owned the company.
Answer:
$12,500
Explanation:
Assets are classified under current and fixed categories. Among items that Granger owns, a boat is an asset; specifically a fixed asset since it can be utilized over a year. Same reason for a car, which is also a fixed asset. Tools help in operating a business hence considered fixed assets as they can be utilized for more than a year. The total value of assets is (4000+8000+500)
Total value = $12,500
Answer:
The correct option is B,$29.05
Explanation:
The required rate of return is can be computed using Miller and Modgiliani CAPM formula below:
Ke=Rf+Beta*Mrp
Ke is the cost of equity which is unknown
Rf is the risk free rate of 3.00%
Mrp is the market risk premium of 5.50%
Beta is 1.2
Ke=3.00%+(1.2*5.50%)
Ke =9.6%
The current price of the common stock is the present value of dividends payment and stock price(terminal value) as shown below discounted with Ke of 9.6%
Year 1 $1.25*(1+25%)=$1.56
*1/(1+9.6%)^1=$1.43
Year 2 $1.56*(1+25%)=$1.95
*1/(1+9.6%)^2=$1.63
Year 3 $1.95*(1+25%)=$2.44
*1/(1+9.6%)^3=$1.85
Year 4 $2.44*(1+25%)=$3.05
*1/(1+9.6%)^4=$2.11
Terminal value=year 4 dividend/ke=$3.05/9.6%=$31.79*1/(1+9.6%)^4=$22.03
Total present values=$1.43
+$1.63+$1.85
+$2.11
+$22.03=$29.05
<span>A BC subteam called the operations team is responsible for establishing the core business functions needed to sustain critical business operations. The operations team is a smaller group of people within an organization that handle behind the scenes team functions. Having an operations team is one of the most important subgroups to have in an organization. </span>
Answer:
Explanation:
In my opinion, I would like to say that Clean Machines Company is correct. If you look at it this way, you'd see that there actually isn't any contract between Clean Machines Company and Dealer. When it came to about offers, the person offering is able to revoke an offer before the offer is even accepted. And he won't be held responsible unless of course, the offer is irrevocable. Then, to make the offer to be irrevocable, the Dealer then would have needed to prove that an option was present, or prove that the offer is was not able to be revoked due to UCC provision.
