The reason is because in 1st person point of view we can see the psychotic nature in which Montresor describes all he did to Fortunato. He explains in crude detail how he killed him with no remorse, he even seems to delight in the acts which he did. For example: when he describes the walls filled with a type of moss, he's already putting inside Fortunato's head that he will have to live and cope with these toxic fumes that will poison his lungs little by little, Fortunato doesn't know it yet, but, he is going to die. And, putting this images in the head is preparing Fortunato for the worse to come, he's preparing Fortunato so he loses all hope. Montresor describes everything like a sociopath would, if it were in third person point of view we wouldn't know what Montresor was personally thinking or feeling only partially.
No, its not logical for a villian to settle among the peasants for multiple reasons:
- He wont be able to practise evil, for if he did, the peasants will inform the heroes before the villain becomes too powerful.
Hope you are satisfied with your answer
It’s teaches you how to speak and work with others
Anecdotes and examples are not strong evidence in a debate.
Answer:
This is a quote by Jack London, from the third chapter (The Dominant Primordial Beast) of his book "The call of the wild." The quote is used to describe when the team spots a rabbit one night, fifty dogs from the Northwest Police camp go on to hunt it, with Buck leading the pack.
Explanation:
The ecstasy that describes, refers to the moment when one feels most alive, which, ironically, makes us forget about being alive, as we just find ourselves at the moment, unaware of anything else. London describes this feeling as what an artist might feel while making a passionate work of art, or what a soldier feels in the heat of battle. And definitely, what Buck felt at that moment, leading the pack in a race influenced by a primal instinct he thought forgotten.
