The correct answer is D) toothpaste and toothbrush.
<em>What is not an example of substitute goods are toothpaste and toothbrush.</em>
In economics, when we are talking about substitute goods we are referring to two alternative goods that could be used for the same reason or purpose.
In the case of this question, you cannot substitute the toothbrush for the toothpaste. You need the two together to brush your teeth. You can do it with one or the other. In the other options, yes, you can substitute margarine for butter or a motorcycle for a car, both are means of transportation.
Answer:
The early political party that favored strong state governments, looked to Thomas Jefferson as its leader, opposed Hamilton's plan and favored the interests of farmers over big business was the Republicans.
Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/2134724#readmore
Explanation:
This is definitely a “History” or “Politics & Government”” question, not “Travel” and I agree with Sue, you’re avoiding doing your own homework. I’m not going to do it for you, but I’ll try and put you on the right track.
The “Roman” institutions (caro amico napoletano, il ragazzo sta parlando della Roma antica, anzi di Bisanzio, che aveva un principio legislatvo ben diverso dal nostro, uno che “funzionava” per essere chiari) definitely influenced the Founding fathers. Some aspects are obvious (The Senate, Governors of Roman Provinces/US States, Ethics) others are less obvious (Representation, civil Rights of citizens, Fiscal system).
The basic differences are of “anglo saxon” inspiration (Pursuit of happiness, Common law, Inviolability of office).
The end result is a very interesting combination of both, which should make US citizens proud of their constitution and system of Government.
Compare Obama’s political platform with the Gracchi brothers, and both Bushes with the Dictator Sulla. You should get quite an interesting result.
The Justinian Code came very late in Roman History, when “Rome” had ceased to exist, and it’s spirit continued to live in Byzantium, in a very watered “Greek” community. In terms of law making, it is certainly interesting, because it is an attempt to sum up all that was positive in the “inherited system”, but it should not be taken out of it’s Historical context, unless you believe the US has reached the same stage of “decline”, which I don’t.
Stricter laws in Roman times? I would say more Draconian, according to the times.
Look up a description of Gibbons’ “Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire” and you should have enough background data to write your paper.
If they are a dictator, tyrant like joseph stalin, benito mussolini, and adolf hitler; they use the censorship of material method to leave people in ignorance as a method for them to keep ruling over them, because they are scared that as soon as they start reading intellectual books( one of the most censored tools in history by dictators) they could recollect knowledge and overthrow their totalitarian government( and it's completely their right)
The resolution of the earliest graphics cards were 320x200
