Answer:
Discussion, projects, campaigns and events provide a supportive platform to the victims of human right violations not only by spreading awareness and letting people know about it, but also by giving them a platform to report their grievances and get the support of the common mass.
There are many groups or organizations that come forward to help the affected ones by providing proper monetary help or support in some other form.
Providing support to the victims to take action against violations and giving them the right stage to raise their voices is equally important.
Have a nice day :)
STEP 1
Describe the work and its creator in the first paragraph. Do not assume that readers know the work or author, so place the work in context. Ask yourself if the text is a first outing for the author or the latest in a long series. Does the author have a reputation or expertise in a certain field? Is the work controversial or well-known or little-known, and why? Describe the intended audience for the work.
STEP 2
Write an accurate summary of the work’s main ideas in the second paragraph. Do not mingle your evaluation with the summary. Merely explain the most important ideas the author tried to convey in the entire work.
STEP 3
Judge the author’s presentation in the third paragraph. Did the author present accurate and relevant data in a logical manner? Did the author clearly define important terms or jargon? Did the author offer sound interpretations? Focus, in this paragraph, on whether the author achieved his or her purpose for creating the work.
STEP 4
State both your agreement and disagreement with the author in the fourth paragraph. Develop your ideas by explaining why you agree and disagree with the author’s ideas. Cite other critics who support your interpretation.
STEP 5
Compose the conclusion, often the shortest paragraph in the critique. Restate the main agreements and objections to the work. In the closing, do not mention any new idea that does not appear.in the body paragraphs. The final paragraph gives an overview of the entire essay by restating its main ideas.
Im pretty sure it was Rene Descartes
Answer:
Structuralism.
Explanation:
<u>Structuralism was the first school of thought coined first by Wilhelm Wundt then later further developed by his student Edward Titchener. </u>
According to this school of psychology, the researchers try to observe the inner feelings using introspection method.
Introspection is the process in which inner thought and emotion are examined.
<u>In the given case, the researcher believes in "structuralism" school of psychology as he is trying to understand the feelings and thoughts of students when they see an apple. </u>
So, the correct answer is "structuralism".
The correct answer of the given question above would be option C. The sentence in which the prepositional phrase best modifies the verb saw is: through the window, I saw the bird flying. The prepositional phrase of this sentence is "through the window" with the preposition "through" and this modifies the verb "saw".
