1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mylen [45]
3 years ago
15

What factor contributed to warfare between the colonists and the Native Americans?

History
2 answers:
egoroff_w [7]3 years ago
5 0

The correct answer is D) the fact that the British ceded territories to the US without Native American consent.

The factor that contributed to warfare between the colonists and the Native Americans was the fact that the British ceded territories to the US without Native American consent.

Armed confrontations between Native American Indians and American colonists started since the very beginning of the arrival of the first Europeans to the Americas. The reasons were many and often. Basically, disputes of land. Native American Indians tried to defend their lands arguing that it belonged to them inherited by their ancestors. White Europeans colonists wanted the land to settled in and start a new life with new property and generate an income.

hoa [83]3 years ago
4 0
Answer:
The fact that the British ceded territory led to American expansion and more conflicts with the Native Americans.
You might be interested in
How did the United states keep representatives of communist China out of the United nations?
Aliun [14]
I don't know but what I always do is just Google it and the answer literally pops up.
4 0
3 years ago
GIVING BRAINLIEST TO THE RIGHT ANSWER
Schach [20]

Answer:

The <u>Law of the Twelve Tables</u> was adopted as the official code of law of the republic.

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why might irene emerson have rejected dred scotts offer to purchase his family and their freedom
notka56 [123]

Answer:

ONIONS

Explanation:

In its 1857 decision that stunned the nation, the United States Supreme Court upheld slavery in United States territories, denied the legality of black citizenship in America, and declared the Missouri Compromise to be unconstitutional. All of this was the result of an April 1846 action when Dred Scott innocently made his mark with an "X," signing his petition in a pro forma freedom suit, initiated under Missouri law, to sue for freedom in the St. Louis Circuit Court. Desiring freedom, his case instead became the lightning rod for sectional bitterness and hostility that was only resolved by war.

image of Dred Scott

Dred Scott

Credit: Missouri Historical Society

"Dred Scott, a man of color, respectfully states. he is claimed as a slave."

(Petition to Sue for Freedom, 6 April 1846)

Initially, Scott's case for freedom was routine and relatively insignificant, like hundreds of others that passed through the St. Louis Circuit Court. The cases were allowed because a Missouri statute stated that any person, black or white, held in wrongful enslavement could sue for freedom. The petition that Dred Scott signed indicated the reasons he felt he was entitled to freedom. Scott's owner, Dr. John Emerson, was a United States Army surgeon who traveled to various military posts in the free state of Illinois and the free Wisconsin Territory. Dred Scott traveled with him and, therefore, resided in areas where slavery was outlawed. Because of Missouri's long-standing "once free, always free" judicial standard in determining freedom suits, slaves who were taken to such areas were freed-even if they returned to the slave state of Missouri. Once the bonds of slavery were broken, they did not reattach.

Dred Scott was born to slave parents in Virginia sometime around the turn of the nineteenth century. His parents may have been the property of Peter Blow, or Blow may have purchased Scott at a later date. The mystery of exact ownership is one that would follow Dred Scott, and later his family, throughout their lives as slaves. With few records extant, it is difficult to identify exactly when ownership of the family was transferred to various parties. By 1830, Peter Blow had settled his family of four sons and three daughters and his six slaves in St. Louis. This was after having moved from Virginia to Alabama, to attempt farming near Huntsville, and, when that failed, a move from Alabama to Missouri. In St. Louis, Peter Blow undertook the running of a boarding house, the Jefferson Hotel. Within a year, though, his wife Elizabeth died and on June 23, 1832, Peter Blow passed away.

image of front view of St. Louis

Front view of St. Louis

Credit: Missouri Historical Society

The Blow children remained in St. Louis after the deaths of their parents and became well established in the city's society through marriage to prominent families. Charlotte Taylor Blow married Joseph Charless, Jr., in November 1831; his father had established the first newspaper west of the Mississippi River and had been a leading opponent of slavery while editor. Charless, Jr., operated a wholesale drug and paint store, Charless & Company (later Charless, Blow, & Company when brothers-in-law Henry Taylor Blow and Taylor Blow became partners). Martha Ella Blow married attorney Charles Drake in 1835. Drake is better known in history for his role in the creation of Missouri's 1865 constitution. As a leader of the Radical Republican Party after the Civil War, he was determined to punish those considered Southern sympathizers; the constitution he helped author took away many of their rights, including enfranchisement. Peter Ethelrod Blow married Eugenie LaBeaume in 1833. She was from an old French banking family; her oldest brother was a wealthy businessman who, in partnership with Blow, formed Peter E. Blow & Company. She had two other brothers; one was the St. Louis County sheriff for a time in the 1840s, and one, Charles Edmund LaBeaume, was a St. Louis attorney who played an important role in Dred Scott's freedom suits. All of these St. Louis connections proved helpful to Dred Scott.

<h2>Hope this helps :)</h2>
5 0
3 years ago
Which of the following amendments gave African-American males the right to vote?
uysha [10]
The answer is C, The Fifteenth Amendment allowed African Americans to have an equal vote
3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
There are 2 toys named after American president one is Lincoln logs what is the other
aliya0001 [1]

K'Nex, the toy's current distributor, states the product was named after Abraham Lincoln—famously born in a log cabin—due to patriotism during World War I. Others attribute the name to Frank Lloyd Wright's original name, Frank Lincoln Wright, or the alteration of the name, 'linkin' logs.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!!!
    10·2 answers
  • The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) is __________.
    6·2 answers
  • What unique challenges study does the study of prehistoric history present.
    14·2 answers
  • Ralph was a young adult in the 1970s. His knowledge of the 1972 Watergate break-in and subsequent cover-up by President Nixon he
    13·1 answer
  • Why did the English come?
    9·1 answer
  • Identify the process that your amendment will have to follow to become part of the Constitution.Some information appears for you
    10·1 answer
  • Why did Einstein write a letter to President Roosevelt
    5·2 answers
  • Wich of the following are the two important roles of the judicial branch in the United States government
    14·1 answer
  • Shakespeare was born in London in 1564.<br> a. True<br> b. False
    15·2 answers
  • How did Florida attract New settlers?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!