Your KEY word is private. The companies may be limited liability, but because they are private, that means that they are privately owned. Privately owned companies are not traded on stock exchange. Often a corporation will issue stock in what’s called an Initial Public Offering. This is to raise capital and allows anyone from the public sector have access to ownership of the company through buying shares of stock. If the company were privately held, it would be owned by the employees or a few investors or a combination
Answer:
No, he doesn't show diminishing marginal utility. Yes, he shows increasing marginal utility for Coke.
Explanation:
The law of diminishing returns states that the marginal or addition satisfaction or utility derived from the consumption of a product increase until a pint and then starts to decrease.
Units Total utility Marginal utility
1 10 10
2 25 15
3 50 25
After 3 bottles, John does not show diminishing marginal utility as the marginal utility (as shown above) continues to increase with each additional bottle of coke consumed.
Answer:
Export.
Explanation:
When a company sells its assets to a buyer in another country it is considered an export as the company is no longer considered an asset of the country of origin.
So when Anhueser Busch InBev sold Budweiser beer made in St. Louis, MO, to Germany, it carried out a United States export to Germany.
Answer:
The correct answer is the option D: Both the foreseeable doctrine and the restatement doctrine.
Explanation:
On the one hand, the <em>foreseeable doctrine</em> dictates that there is a limit in the liability of party for those acts that he has done and that carry a risk of foreseeable harm. Therefore that this point of view establishes that a reasonable person would be able to understand and so to know when a certain action would bring certain damages to another party.
On the oher hand, the <em>restatement doctrine</em> establishes that there are a set of treatises on legal subjects that primarily are looking for to inform judges and lawyers about general principles of common law. And therefore that those treatises will help both the judge and the lawyers at the time of the trial when the person has to go to court.
Answer:
a. -$783 Unfavorable
b. 550 Favorable
Explanation:
a. The computation of Variable Overhead Rate Variance is shown below:-
Variable Overhead Rate Variance = Actual hours × (Standard Variable Overhead rate per hour - Actual Variable Overhead rate per hour)
= 8,700 × ($4.10 - ($36,540 ÷ 8,700)
= 8,700 × ($4.10 - $4.19)
= 8,700 × -$0.09
= -$783 Unfavorable
b. The computation of Variable Overhead Efficiency Variance is shown below:-
Variable Overhead Efficiency Variance = Standard Variable Overhead Rate per Hour × (Standard Hours for Actual Production - Actual Hours)
= 5.5 × ((5.5 × 1,600) - 8,700)
= 5.5 × (8,800 - 8,700)
= 5.5 × 100
= 550 Favorable
