Answer:
The best answer to the question: Which evidence does not provide good support for this claim: Animal testing, though harmful to the lives of animals, is a vital resource for lifesaving medicines and vacciones that can prolong human life, would be: The evidence that the use of animals for experimentation has gone as far back as Ancient Greece, around the 3rd and 4th centuries BCE, and which we learn about from writings from Aristotle and from Erasistratus, one of the first persons to actually document his own use of animals for experimentation.
Explanation:
The reason is that talking about ancient history, and how far back the use of animals for different experimentations, be them scientific or not, goes, does not help prove at all the claim that even though animal testing is harmful for animals, it is vital for providing lifesaving medicines and vacciones that support human health. That evidence shows only how long animal testing has been known for, and used, but does not help to prove that it is justified, or good.
