The Protestant Reformation, with its antipathy toward received religious dogma, was another precursor. Perhaps the most important sources of what became the Enlightenment were the complementary rational and empirical methods of discovering the truth that was introduced by the scientific revolution.
Evidence that can be used to modify or refute what Stannard said about Columbus would be (D) examples of long-term benefits for people in Europe and Asia that resulted from the voyages by Columbus.
<h3>What did Stannard think of Columbus?</h3>
David Stannard thinks very lowly of Christopher Columbus as a result of the latter's crimes in North America which included the killing and mutilating of Native Americans.
David Stannard believed that the exploration of the Americas brought only long-term pain to Native Americans so a view that would refute this would have to show descriptions that Native Americans enjoyed some long term benefits thanks to Columbus.
Find out more on Christopher Columbus at brainly.com/question/15581111
#SPJ1
Answer: the first one is correct, Hati would be last and Napoleon would be second.
The machine clearly would, and it worked even harder to embrace ... and the Tammany organization actively courting their support with offers of food, ... foes, who saw political influence by poor immigrants as a crime in itself.
Answer: North Korean invasion of South Korea
Explanation:
