1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
USPshnik [31]
3 years ago
8

Would the Renaissance and the reformation be considered radical why or why not

History
1 answer:
dimulka [17.4K]3 years ago
3 0
Yes, i believe renaissance and the reformation should be considered radical.
Something can be considered as radical if it's<span> affecting the fundamental nature of something.
When renaissance and the reformation started to appear, it challenges the traditional method of making arts and replace it with the new one.</span>
You might be interested in
Why did the Quakers settle in Pennsylvania? Quakers were allowed to practice their religion freely and without persecution. The
LUCKY_DIMON [66]

Answer:

Quakers were allowed to practice their religion freely and without persecution

Explanation:

Quakers had religious freedom in pennsylvania. The colonoybwas established by a fellow quaker called william Penn. King charles was his friend and he did not want to kill him. In other to avoid being persecuted, he was given grant to get land.

It was a very good place to settle with philadelphia being the most developed city the continent had. As proprietor, william Penn granted religious freedom and tolerance to all.

8 0
3 years ago
Which statements about September 11, 2001 are true?
Elza [17]

Answer/Explanation:

1. Happend in 19'00s

2.TRUE

3.on DEC 11, 2003

4.Happend in 18'00s

.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the main purpose of the Fredonian Rebellion?
dsp73

Answer:

It was the first attempt by Anglo settlers in Texas to secede from Mexico. The settlers, led by Empresario Haden Edwards, declared independence from Mexican Texas and created the Republic of Fredonia near Nacogdoches.

(A) is the correct answer

3 0
2 years ago
!!!!help asap brainliest reward!!!!!
k0ka [10]

Answer:

She should be prosecuted

Explanation:

In order to convict a defendant of malicious destruction of property, the Commonwealth must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that:

The defendant destroyed or damaged the personal property, building, or dwelling house of another person;

The defendant did so willfully; and.

The defendant acted with malice.

I copied this online, so don't copy, but this shows why you could convict Tracy of the crime. She destroyed people's personal property, their phones, which she did willfully. This goes to show why she should be prosecuted and charged. Thanks, and I hope this helps! BRAINLIEST PLEASE!

6 0
3 years ago
Which line from the passage most clearly identifies the
mihalych1998 [28]

Answer: the german submarines

Explanation:

just got it right

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Global imperialism was increased by the involvement of independent bankers and businessmen in the industrialized nations. These
    15·2 answers
  • What are two reasons that James Oglethorp started Georga?
    10·1 answer
  • What are three main elements of all political parties?
    8·1 answer
  • The New Jersey plan which was presented at the constitutional convention stated what?
    6·1 answer
  • What made the establishment of Black Colleges possible
    7·1 answer
  • What three departments did congress establish in the executive branch of the government?
    15·2 answers
  • Which Essential Elements of Geography you would use to study the weather in an area.
    14·1 answer
  • Why did Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton focus their attention on women’s suffrage?
    15·1 answer
  • Match the following items.
    10·1 answer
  • Why did the civil right amendment have to be passed
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!