The best way to describe the Soviet-Afghan is by calling it a failure, due to the Soviets being forced to withdrawal. One main reason they lost is because they didn’t have a good counter to guerrilla warfare, and continued loosing battles because of it. There were also various other reasons (clothing, no initiative in commanders, etc).
Here are why the other answers are incorrect:
1. The Soviets were not actually able to defeat the afghan insurgents (Mujahideen), and were forced to leave (as answer 3 says).
2. The insurgents and Soviets suffered numerous casualties, but it is correct in the sense of calling the invasion a failure.
4. I don’t believe any reforms were introduced as a direct result of the Soviet-Afghan war.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
you have to go through naturlization
I know this. I went to Oklahoma last year and I went to the Cherokee village. they had very little shelter it was made by hand. it was like a cottage. That's what it looked like when I went to the Cherokee village. My grandpa has Cherokee in him.
Answer:
The letter D is the right answer.
Explanation:
The text presented by Darwin shows an argument that it was impossible to establish a Eurasian empire through nomadic foundations. However, the establishment of the Safavid Empire disputes this information, as this was one of the most influential and powerful Aryan empires ever seen in Eurasia. The Safávida Empire had a great cultural and religious influence that pierced even after its decline in 1722, reaching the Afexárida, Zande, Cajar and Pálavi dynasties. Currently, it is possible to see various elements of its influence in the current Islamic Republic of Iran.
6. _<span> Desiderius Erasmus .</span>was the best known of all Christian humanists.
hope it helps