1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
blagie [28]
4 years ago
9

Which act of Francisco Pizarro and his men ended the Incan Empire?

History
1 answer:
Reptile [31]4 years ago
4 0
<span>He springs a trap on the Incan emperor, Pizarro lures Atahualpa to a feast in the emperor’s honor and then opens fire on the unarmed Incans. Pizarro’s men massacre the Incans and capture Atahualpa, forcing him to convert to Christianity before eventually killing him.</span>
You might be interested in
What impact do you think gallipoli had on the russian war effort?
Semenov [28]

Answer:

Explanation:

The Ottoman Empire

Total casualties may have amounted to more than 250,000. All in all, by the time the Gallipoli Campaign ended, more than 130,000 men had been killed and 262,000 wounded. In total, there were just under 400,000 casualties during the campaign

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain ONE historical development that contributed to the context for rise of extremist groups prior to World War II.
kirill115 [55]

Answer: PLZ GIVE BRAINLEST

Explanation:

Historians from many countries have given considerable attention to studying and understanding the causes of World War II, a global war from 1939 to 1945 that was the deadliest conflict in human history. The immediate precipitating event was the invasion of Poland by Nazi Germany on September 1, 1939, and the subsequent declarations of war on Germany made by Britain and France, but many other prior events have been suggested as ultimate causes. Primary themes in historical analysis of the war's origins include the political takeover of Germany in 1933 by Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party; Japanese militarism against China, which led to the Second Sino-Japanese War; Italian aggression against Ethiopia, which led to the Second Italo-Ethiopian War; and Germany's initial success in negotiating a neutrality pact with the Soviet Union to divide territorial control of Eastern Europe between them.

During the Battle of Westerplatte, the German battleship Schleswig-Holstein attacks Westerplatte at the start of the war, September 1, 1939

The destroyer USS Shaw explodes during the attack on Pearl Harbor, December 7, 1941

During the interwar period, deep anger arose in the Weimar Republic regarding the conditions of the 1919 Treaty of Versailles, which punished Germany for its role in World War I with severe conditions and heavy financial reparations in order to prevent it from ever becoming a military power again. This provoked strong currents of revanchism in German politics, with complaints primarily focused on the demilitarization of the Rhineland, the prohibition of German unification with Austria, and the loss of some German-speaking territories and overseas colonies.

The 1930s were a decade in which democracy was in disrepute; countries across the world turned to authoritarian regimes during the worldwide economic crisis of the Great Depression.[1] In Germany, resentment and hatred of other countries was intensified by the end of World War I in late 1918, the world's social and geopolitical circumstances had fundamentally and irrevocably changed. The Allies had been victorious, but many of Europe's economies and infrastructures were devastated, including those of the victors. France, along with the other victor countries, was in a desperate situation regarding its economy, security, and morale, and understood that its position in 1918 was "artificial and transitory".[2] Thus, Prime Minister of France Georges Clemenceau worked to gain French security via the Treaty of Versailles, and French security demands, such as reparations, coal payments, and a demilitarized Rhineland, took precedence at the Paris Peace Conference of 1919–1920,[2] which designed the treaty. The war "must be someone's fault – and that's a very natural human reaction" analyzed historian Margaret MacMillan.[3] Germany was charged with the sole responsibility of starting World War I, and the "War Guilt Clause" was the first step towards a satisfying revenge for the victor countries, namely France, against Germany. Ginsberg argues, "France was greatly weakened and, in its weakness and fear of a resurgent Germany, sought to isolate and punish Germany....French revenge would come back to haunt France during the Nazi invasion and occupation twenty years later."[4]

7 0
3 years ago
I need help! help!Help!Help!
VLD [36.1K]

Answer:

c separation of powers(sorry don't have explanation)

7 0
3 years ago
How did innovations during the Industrial Revolution change life in Great Britain in the 19th century?
steposvetlana [31]

Answer:

The industrial and economic developments of the Industrial Revolution brought significant social changes. Industrialization resulted in an increase in population and the phenomenon of urbanization, as a growing number of people moved to urban centres in search of employment.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
What is the difference between the cold war and the ww1 cause I am lost???
Alex787 [66]
The world war is many countries fighting and a cold war isn't
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What did some memebers of the church do?
    11·1 answer
  • According to Israelite belief, what was God's covenant with Abraham?
    14·1 answer
  • What do both national and state governments both do?
    10·1 answer
  • How did the U.S. government policy of internment affect thousands of Japanese Americans on the West Coast of the United States?
    14·1 answer
  • 100 POINTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    14·2 answers
  • What challenges did the Aztecs face building their city Tenochtitlan on the islands in Lake Texcoco?
    11·1 answer
  • How do u think congress responded to liliuokalani's letter
    8·1 answer
  • Which statements about Saddam Hussein are accurate? Check all that apply.
    11·1 answer
  • Slaves could not testify in court against a white, make contracts, leave the plantation without permission, strike a white (even
    14·2 answers
  • 2. (Unit 3 The Early Middle Ages) -What was true about feudalism? a. People were born into a social class. b. Church officials h
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!