Essentially, it had to do with political power. Slave-holding states wanted to include slaves who were unable to cast ballots in their political representation in Congress. Non-slave states perceived this as a ruse to exert influence over the newly formed government. This topic has been covered in a lot of writing. Contrary to some who assert that shows how the founders thought about black people, they address the problem of political representation. Since they now had more representation in the halls of government than the non-slave states, many in the slave states viewed this as a victory. Most individuals who opposed slavery simply wanted to count the free people in a population, but those who supported it wanted to count slaves as well. As a result, slave owners would be represented in the Electoral College and the House of Representatives by a greater number of seats. Numerous ratios were taken into consideration, including three-fourths, half, and one-quarter. James Madison would propose the Three-Fifths Compromise after much discussion. The Three-Fifths Compromise was not accepted by all of the states, and the Articles of Confederation needed a unanimous vote. As a result, the Compromise was not ratified until the Constitutional Convention. The Three-Fifths Compromise would dramatically increase slave-owning states' political clout and representation. If the Southern states had been represented equally, 33 seats in the House of Representatives would have gone to them. However, as a result of the Three-Fifths Compromise, the Southern states did have 47 seats in the House of Representatives of the first American Congress in 1790. As a result, by accumulating enough political influence, the South would be able to take control of presidential elections.
3) Consumer sovereignty concerns the principle of hedonism, individualism and, as some economists often say, selfishness, or exacerbated individual freedom, where the human being has complete freedom to do, whatever he wants and understands and, anywhere, nothing interferes with the decisions of those who need to satisfy their needs. This economic philosophy adopts the principle of laissez faire, or in other words, what works is Adam Smith's infamous <u>invisible hand</u>, or more clearly, the system where the government does not interfere in the economy, it exists only to coordinate the political and social system, without active participation in the development of economic activity. It is what is called in the classic and neoclassical language, an economy of free competition, that is to say, everyone is free before their preferred choices.
4) The economic system in the US is <u>free enterprise.</u> Free enterprise is a principle that establishes the possibility for ordinary people to participate in the market without the need for authorization or approval by the State. If you have the possibility to open a company, sell a product and negotiate the price that is right for you, you owe it to the principle of free enterprise.
The government has a fundamental role in the economic system, such as legislating, placing wealth in the market, as well as inspecting these systems.
5) The price floor wage is the lowest wage a company can pay for an employee. It is established by law and is reassessed every year based on the cost of living of the population, its creation was made based on the minimum amount that a person spends to guarantee their survival.
The most common price floor is the minimum wage--a minimum price that can be payed for labor.
The correct answer is B) it allows Senators to prevent a vote on Bills that would otherwise pass.
<em>The statement that best describes an effect of filibuster is “it allows Senators to prevent a vote on Bills that would otherwise pass.”
</em>
In the United States Senate, filibuster is a tactic to delay or to block a bill, a resolution ora n amendment. Senators prevent those to be voted. Filibuster only can happen in the Senate. Once a Senator starts to speak on the floor, he or she can take any time they want to expose his/her arguments. The term filibuster comes from the Spanish word “filibustero” that could be translated as a “pirate”.
No. It was a total surprise to them.
one main reason why it started is because of different views on slavery and whether or not it should be legal also the election of abraham lincoln as president. hope this helped
