<u>Available Options Are:</u>
A. Create an owner-based sharing rule to grant access to account records that have the same segment to all sales manager roles.
B. Change the role hierarchy and put all of the sales managers in the US and Canada in the same role.
C. Create criteria-based sharing rules to grant access to account records that have the same segment to all sales manager roles.
D. Create a public group and include all accounts of the same segment and grant access through a permission set.
Answer:
Option A. Create an owner-based sharing rule to grant access to account records that have the same segment to all sales manager roles
Explanation:
This owner based sharing will allow the sales manager to access information but he will not be able to alter information which gives a right to access information only. This sharing of information will resolve the sales manager concern and will also him and other sales manager to use this information to make informed decisions. Hence Option A is correct.
Putting in the same role would manipulate the data because the data entered by each sales manager will not be distinguished easily and thus the system will not produce meaningful results. Hence Option B is also incorrect.
Option C is also incorrect because allowing access on meeting certain criteria would result in restriction of data. Thus it is not the solution.
Option D allowing access to all the data would not be necessary as some of the data might require protection and also that it might be meaningless to have private accounts. Thus the option D is incorrect.
Answer:
Please consider the following explanation
Explanation:
Vaseline can improve its financial performance by doing some product differentiation, as the rest 15% are also selling petroleum jelly but at much lower costs than Vaseline, and to convince its customers to spend extra bucks to buy Vaseline, it needs to provide something extra.
Vaseline can incorporate extra ingredients like aloevera, or turmeric, etc, i.e. the beauty or health fashions prevalent in the market this information can be obtained by a thorough research of the beauty blogs available online.
Once the product has something extra, Vaseline can go ahead and market its product better based on the benefits of the product differentiation, and hence steam away market from the remaining 15% and increase its financial performance.
Answer:
substitution and income effects will counteract each other totally
Explanation:
A labor supply curve is an economic analysis tool that shows the number or workers that are available to work or that can work at various wage rates.
The labor supply curve can either be bending backwards or sloping downwards or upward curving but it shows the relationship between labour and wage rates.
A labor supply curve can be affected by factors such as population, changes in social behaviour, opportunities in other markets, among other things.
From the above question, it is seen that a change in wage rate for Anthony from $25 to $29 does not affect his work hours positively of negatively. His work hours is the same despite the increase in hourly wage.
The effect of the Anthony sticking to 40 hours of work despite an increase in wage, which could have served as some motivation for him to put in more hours is his labor curve remains same. An increase in wage has done noting to affect the number of hours he works and as such his income vs work rate counters each other.
Cheers.
Answer:
Bond price=$888.35
Explanation:
<em>The value of the bond is the present value (PV) of the future cash receipts expected from the bond. The value is equal to present values of interest payment plus the redemption value (RV) discounted at the yield rate</em>
<em>Value of Bond = PV of interest + PV of RV</em>
The value of bond for Local School District can be worked out as follows:
Step 1
PV of interest payments
PV = A × (1+r)^(-n)/r
A-annul interest payment:
= 7.5% × 1,000× = 75
r-Annual yield = 8.6%
n-Maturity period = 25
PV of interest payment:
=75× (1- (1+0.086)^(-25)/0.086)
= 761.22
Step 2
<em>PV of Redemption Value</em>
= 1000 × (1.017)^(-25)
= $127.131
Step 3
<em>Price of bond</em>
=761.222 + 127.13
=$888.35
