<span>Which of the following is true of all greenhouse gases?
</span>
C. THEY TRAP ENERGY IN THE ATMOSPHERE.
They are not naturally occurring. They are the result of human activity like using electricity, burning fuel, etc.
They don't exist in fixed quantities and they don't reflect incoming radiation. The volume of greenhouse gases emitted depends on the activity done. It also does not stay in one place, it moves around and combines with other green house gases; trapping heat in the atmosphere and making the Earth warmer.
The answer to this question would be hypertonic.
If the chloroplast is going to be pushed against the cell wall, probably the water around the cell wall is decreased, causing it to suck up the water inside. Then, the solution must be causing the cell to lose water. The cell will lose water if put in a hypertonic solution. In a hypertonic solution, the osmotic pressure of the solution is higher than the cell, make it attract water from cells.
Answer:
The answer should be "by an increase in the weathering of rocks that contribute to the mineral makeup of soil"
Explanation:
The rate of soil formation can be accelerated by an increase in the weathering of rocks that contribute to the mineral makeup of soil. Topsoil can be increased through the increase of available organic material. Erosion can also lead to an increase in available parent material for soil formation.
I hope the helps :)
sorry if it's wrong.
Answer:Conservation biologists, philosophers, environmental ethicists, and others offer several key reasons to conserve biodiversity. One argument is that organisms have direct economic value for humans. We use plants and animals for medicines, food, clothes, building materials, recreation, and other luxuries and necessities. But what if an organism that is of no use to us for food or hides is screened for useful medicinal compounds and found to have none? Do we sanction its extermination? Why must a plant or animal be of direct economic benefit to humans to have worth? Economic value alone is not the only reason to preserve biodiversity.
Another reason often given…to conserve biodiversity is that organisms, as components of ecosystems, provide services, and their interactions with other organisms contribute to the overall healthy functioning of ecosystems… On a practical level, biologists want to know just how much the loss of a few species will reduce the quality of services within a specific ecosystem. Two schools of thought prevail.
