Conflict diamonds are defined by the Kimberly process as rough diamonds use my rebels movements to finance wars against legitimate governments. As a result of this narrow definition, the Kimberly process is not empowered to address the board range of risks to human rights posed by the trade in diamonds, such as those which have been documented in Zimbabwe
Honestly in my opinion the people who distribute the milk. If cows that have medicine get milked it will ruin a whole pool of milk. Which would make it useless to the public
They didn't need to pay any expenses whatsoever. They were the main ones who could hold vital positions. Officers in the armed force. Nobles controlled peasants. They didn't need to pay most duties and gathered tolls from individuals utilizing streets and markets. Numerous nobles and clergy lived in awesome extravagance in chateaux and castles.
Europeans did not have the right to colonize other people. Although at the time they viewed themselves as the superiors of the world, colonizing other nations lead to many nations becoming similar to European countries and being forced to do labor rather than develop their own culture and system. Europeans could have achieved their goals of wealth and power without colonizing other people. This could've been achieved by creating alliances with nations they wished to colonize rather than completely taking them over. This would've lead to not only peaceful and larger relations but beneficial circumstances to both parties.
Hope this helps!
