Answer:
The reason why The people who serve in the army have to obey different laws than civilians is because their status as the authority to defend the citizens. This important status make them have to be held to higher standards.
For example, let's say that an army personnel was caught in camera during a fist fight with normal civilians.
That personnel will heavily damage the public perception toward the army. How can you expect those civilians to trust the army as the defender of their safety is they're caught hurting their own people ?
Because of this, the legal punishment that given toward army personnel tend to be stricter than civilians.
Answer:
The list of the countries rom the most fully democratic on the top to the least democatric is:
Indonesia
Philippines
Vietnam
Laos
Thailand
Myanmar
Explanation:
The reasons behind this answer are the following: First of all, Indonesia is a democratic republic that chooses his leaders by democratic vote and its laws take the opinion of people in the count before the decisions are made. The Philippines is a republic also, but it has adopted a dictatorial or at least a very strong leftist approach that doesn't listen to the opinion of the people to takes its decisions. Vietnam is a socialist republic, which means that the power is concentrated by one party, and they vote to take decisions but they have no meaningful opposition. Thailand is a unitary kingdom ruled by a single code of norms administered by a hierarchy of managers for different provinces. Laos is a socialist democracy with only one party and they manage the decision-making process without listening to the citizens. Myanmar is a totalitarian country that is governed by a bicameral parliament that chooses its leaders by appointing them as candidates and then follow voting to declare a winner. It relays on military rule.
Answer:it changed cause back in the day kids would have to work in factories but now they have laws against it and same goes with the hours of work and the safety
Explanation:
Answer:
I think Kirishima.
Explanation:
I don't know both of these. Sorry if I am wrong.
The Homestead Act of 1862 provided that any adult citizen (or person intending to become a citizen) who headed a family could qualify for a grant of 160 acres of public land by paying a small registration fee and living on the land continuously for five years. If the settler was willing to pay $1.25 an acre, he could obtain the land after only six months’ residence.
But the law did not provide the new beginning for urban slum dwellers that some had hoped; few such families had the resources to start farming, even on free land. The grants did give new opportunities to many impoverished farmers from the East and Midwest, but much of the land granted under the Homestead Act fell quickly into the hands of speculators. Also, over time, the growing mechanization of American agriculture led to the replacement of individual homesteads with a smaller number of much larger farms.