1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
larisa [96]
3 years ago
14

Anti-Federalists argued that?

History
2 answers:
lys-0071 [83]3 years ago
6 0

The correct answer is: Option B. It was impossible to separate government into equal branches.

The Anti-Federalists stated that a strong, centralized federal government would equate tyranny, and therefore its powers needed to be divided in separate branches. These individuals sought to minimize the power of the centralized government, and at the same time, provide more to the state governments.

Gwar [14]3 years ago
5 0
B. it was impossible to separate government into equal branches. i just did it on a test and got it right.
You might be interested in
“I admit that the punishments of the slaves on Barbados for all sorts of offenses are indeed very cruel, but one must consider b
Kruka [31]

Answer:

I think its”The Whites need to impress fear and respect upon their slaves in order not to one day find themselves the victims or their fury”

8 0
2 years ago
Which statement best expresses Ibn battuta’s point of view in this passage
s2008m [1.1K]

The statement that best expresses <em>Ibn battuta’s</em> point of view in this passage is that the ruler of Mali is both rich and powerful. His final journey took him to Mali, a Muslim empire in West Africa which was 1000 miles South of Morocco across the Sahara Desert. In 1352, <em>Ibn Battuta</em> joined a desert caravan on his last great adventure headed for Mali that was known for its gold and great wealth. Mali's peak of power and wealth witnessed under <em>Mansa Musa</em>, and his successor, <em>Mansa Sulayman</em> whom<em> Ibn Battuta</em> met on his journey whom he described as rich and powerful.

8 0
3 years ago
Who institutes or created government in the declaration of independence
LenaWriter [7]

Answer:

Man/people

Explanation:

In the Declaration of Independence, it states the following:

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. "

In conclusion, the answer to your question is Men are the ones who institute the government and it is the right of the people to institute a new government or to abolish it.

8 0
3 years ago
Which of the following phrases best characterizes Herbert Hoover’s foreign policy agenda?
Galina-37 [17]

Answer:

The correct answer choice for the question: Which of the following phrases best characterizes Herbert Hoover´s foreign policy agenda, would be: the last one: Mutual respect, in terms of being available to support others when called upon, but not interfering unnecessarily in their affairs.

Explanation:

Herbert Hoover served as the 31st president of the United States from 1929 to 1933, and he faced one of the toughest economical debacles in all of history. Although highly criticized later for the inefficient ways in which he was perceived to have acted to stop the domino effects of the Great Depression, there is one thing that can be said about him; he definitely believed in non-interventionism, whether on internal affairs, or foreign affairs. In foreign relations, Hoover was responsible for stepping down from intervening anymore in Latin American affairs, and also, as events that led to World War II, on events that took place in Asia. However, he was also always ready to act if needed; thus, he was not above threatening to intervene militarily in the Dominican Republic, and other such places. This is why the last option is the best one to describe this character´s international agenda.

5 0
3 years ago
WILL GIVE BRAINLEIST
I am Lyosha [343]

Answer:

B.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Effects of geography on imperialism and industrialization in Great Britain ????
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following groups advocated militancy?
    11·2 answers
  • What did the nazis mean when they used the term aryan ?
    8·1 answer
  • What is public policy? Why is citizen action important in public policy?
    13·1 answer
  • What Was the Largest Contiguous Empire in History?
    11·1 answer
  • Did the emergency banking act forbid the harding of gold?
    12·1 answer
  • He’s watching you who go you think is the intended audience for the poster?
    10·1 answer
  • Where did george washington have his inauguration?
    11·1 answer
  • HELPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
    15·1 answer
  • Which Supreme Court decision did Brown v. Board of Education (1954) overturn?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!